Re: stdint_.h incorrectly assumes unsigned of 'int64_t'

2006-11-10 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Paul Eggert wrote: Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ...which I assume those who have been following my NSK woes will immediately spot the flaw in? :-) Thanks, I installed this patch into gnulib: [patch snipped] That looks good, thanks! (This was stdint_.h from coreutils-6.4, IIR

Re: stdint_.h incorrectly assumes unsigned of 'int64_t'

2006-11-09 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [adding bug-m4, since you mentioned it] According to Paul Eggert on 11/9/2006 6:15 PM: > >> Also I'm >> actually trying to build m4 at the moment; should I be cc'ing bugs-m4 >> on this stuff?) > > m4 uses gnulib, so when they upgrade to the latest

Re: stdint_.h incorrectly assumes unsigned of 'int64_t'

2006-11-09 Thread Paul Eggert
Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ...which I assume those who have been following my NSK woes will > immediately spot the flaw in? :-) Thanks, I installed this patch into gnulib: 2006-11-09 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * lib/stdint_.h (uintmax_t): Fix typo: int64_t -> u

stdint_.h incorrectly assumes unsigned of 'int64_t'

2006-11-09 Thread Matthew Woehlke
stdint_.h has this: #undef uintmax_t #if @HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT@ && ULONG_MAX >> 31 == 1 # define uintmax_t unsigned long long int #elif defined int64_t # define uintmax_t uint64_t #else # define uintmax_t unsigned long int #endif ...which I assume those who have been following my NSK woes