Bruno Haible wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> But yes, it is sufficient to use the
>> lighter-weight AC_C_INLINE, rather than the full-blown 'inline' module.
>> Thanks for catching that.
>
> This overkill also occurs in a number of other places. I'm applying the first
> patch below.
>
> Jim, is the se
Bruno Haible clisp.org> writes:
> Jim, is the second patch (at the end) below also OK to apply?
>
> 2009-12-31 Bruno Haible clisp.org>
>
> Use AC_C_INLINE instead of module 'inline' where possible.
> * m4/openat.m4 (gl_PREREQ_OPENAT): Require AC_C_INLINE.
> * modules/openat
Eric Blake wrote:
> But yes, it is sufficient to use the
> lighter-weight AC_C_INLINE, rather than the full-blown 'inline' module.
> Thanks for catching that.
This overkill also occurs in a number of other places. I'm applying the first
patch below.
Jim, is the second patch (at the end) below als
