Bruno Haible wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: >> But yes, it is sufficient to use the >> lighter-weight AC_C_INLINE, rather than the full-blown 'inline' module. >> Thanks for catching that. > > This overkill also occurs in a number of other places. I'm applying the first > patch below. > > Jim, is the second patch (at the end) below also OK to apply? ... > 2009-12-31 Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> > > Use AC_C_INLINE instead of module 'inline' where possible. > * m4/openat.m4 (gl_PREREQ_OPENAT): Require AC_C_INLINE. > * modules/openat (Depends-on): Remove inline. ... > AC_DEFUN([gl_PREREQ_OPENAT], > [ > + AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_INLINE]) > AC_REQUIRE([gl_PROMOTED_TYPE_MODE_T]) > : > ]) > --- modules/openat.orig Thu Dec 31 15:48:03 2009 > +++ modules/openat Thu Dec 31 15:30:51 2009 > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ > fcntl-h > fdopendir > gettext-h > -inline
That looks fine. Thanks! Eric, yes, please add your name to modules/openat's Maintainer: field.
