Paul Eggert wrote:
> "James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Doesn't the previous code actually produce the _maximum_ version (that
> > is, with sort .. | tail -1)?
>
> Yes, and thanks for catching that. Hmm, nobody has used this since
> December 30? Anyway, I installed this:
Thanks fo
"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't the previous code actually produce the _maximum_ version (that
> is, with sort .. | tail -1)?
Yes, and thanks for catching that. Hmm, nobody has used this since
December 30? Anyway, I installed this:
2007-01-04 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTEC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> If this bootstrapping issue could be avoided it would be nice.
I installed this patch to do that. Thanks for reporting it. Also, I
noticed the code uses "tail -1" which POSIX does not require support
for, so I fixed that too.
2006-12-30 Paul Eggert <[
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bob Proulx on 12/30/2006 9:03 PM:
> Bootstrapping a new architecture from bare metal is often a
> problematic exercise in circular dependencies. I ran into a case of
> this while building the coreutils.
This is often the case for a numbe
Bootstrapping a new architecture from bare metal is often a
problematic exercise in circular dependencies. I ran into a case of
this while building the coreutils.
Bootstrapping coreutils on a pristine HP-UX 11.23 ia64 machine
produces the following error:
./bootstrap: gnulib/gnulib-tool --imp
