Paul Eggert wrote: > "James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Doesn't the previous code actually produce the _maximum_ version (that > > is, with sort .. | tail -1)? > > Yes, and thanks for catching that. Hmm, nobody has used this since > December 30? Anyway, I installed this:
Thanks for installing those. Since I only had one version installed it was both the min and the max version and it worked the same in my case regardless. Bob
