On 6 November 2013 14:51, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 07:48 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > Nothing so exciting I'm afraid, it's there to give 'git describe' a fair
> shot at working even in a shallow cloned gnulib subproject - otherwise
> certain invocations of bootstrap can break the relea
On 11/06/2013 07:48 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Nothing so exciting I'm afraid, it's there to give 'git describe' a fair shot
> at working even in a shallow cloned gnulib subproject - otherwise certain
> invocations of bootstrap can break the release rules in maint.mk.
>
> Jim plans to push a v
On 6 November 2013 14:48, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Reuben,
>
> > On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> >
> > I'm intrigued by the version number tag 0.1 I get from a recent gnulib
> update, but poking around a) the repo, b) the mailing list arch
Hi Reuben,
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
> I'm intrigued by the version number tag 0.1 I get from a recent gnulib
> update, but poking around a) the repo, b) the mailing list archive, c) the
> sources and d) the web gives no clue as to its mea
I'm intrigued by the version number tag 0.1 I get from a recent gnulib
update, but poking around a) the repo, b) the mailing list archive, c) the
sources and d) the web gives no clue as to its meaning or intended use.
Apologies if I've overlooked something, but I'd love to be
