On 6 November 2013 14:51, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/06/2013 07:48 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > Nothing so exciting I'm afraid, it's there to give 'git describe' a fair > shot at working even in a shallow cloned gnulib subproject - otherwise > certain invocations of bootstrap can break the release rules in maint.mk. > > > > Jim plans to push a version tag every 1000 commits or so. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-10/msg00118.html >
OK, I now found this by searching for "v0.1". I had previously tried "tag 0.1". I can see that since the tag is really "v0.1" this was an error on my part, but is there a more forgiving search system one can use on the mailing list archives? For example, Google Groups has pretty good search, but I can't find a mirror of bug-gnulib there. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
