Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
> wrote:
>> 4. hash_pjw_s_no_tablesize()
>> We can eliminate (2), but still there are 3 variants of the same
>> function. Maybe it is better to keep only (4) and (1) for backwards
>> compatibility, and anybo
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
> 4. hash_pjw_s_no_tablesize()
> We can eliminate (2), but still there are 3 variants of the same
> function. Maybe it is better to keep only (4) and (1) for backwards
> compatibility, and anybody who wants to do the % tablesize to d
