On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n...@gnutls.org> wrote: > 4. hash_pjw_s_no_tablesize() > We can eliminate (2), but still there are 3 variants of the same > function. Maybe it is better to keep only (4) and (1) for backwards > compatibility, and anybody who wants to do the % tablesize to do it > after calling the hash_pjw_s_no_tablesize() function?
And having said that, here is that function. regards, Nikos
0001-Added-hash-pjw-s.patch
Description: Binary data
