Mark D. Baushke writes:
>
> It would be good to understand how to fix the IRIX 5.x without breaking
> the IRIX 6.x compilation. It appears that the testing of the last run
> on an SGI box failed during the sshstdio-6 test.
Yep -- maybe more cleanup is needed in the test?
--- wrapper.dif Mon Jun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Martin,
I have Installed Bruno's latest GNULIB changes into the CVS sources.
If there are still problems, it would be good to know what you are
seeing out of the 'configure' command... both the output and selected
parts of the config.log file.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Martin,
As an FYI, one of the test machines that builds the CVS sources nightly
is an SGI IRIX64 running 6.5 (Hmmm... I had thought we also had an SGI
IRIX 5.3 out there somewhere, but I must have been confused as I do not
see any results from such
Martin Neitzel wrote:
> > > # if > 32 ||<=== flagged error here
> > This is valid ANSI C and ISO C 99 code. When you don't pass "-w2" to your
> > compiler, does it show an error or a warning about this?
>
> Omitting -w2 doesn't change anything.
OK, thanks, I'
Just for completeness' sake:
> > I'm using -w2 which turns all warnings into serious errors
> > requiring some treatment (just like gcc -Werror does).
> But this is something we cannot support. [...]
I am perfectly happy with that position. The -w2 treatment is my
personal entertainment. I'd o
> > # if > 32 || <=== flagged error here
> This is valid ANSI C and ISO C 99 code. When you don't pass "-w2" to your
> compiler, does it show an error or a warning about this?
Omitting -w2 doesn't change anything. (Not surprisingly, since -w2 doesn't
soften
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> * stdint_.h (__bsdos__): BSD/OS 4.2 needs to include
>to avoid a generated that redifines
> typedefs already found in .
Thanks, I'm putting this into gnulib.
> #if @HAVE_STDINT_H@
>/* Other systems may have an incomplete . */
> -# includ
Martin Neitzel wrote:
> into this illegal stdint.h code:
>
> /* wint_t limits */
> #ifndef WINT_MIN
> # if 0
> # if > 32 ||<=== flagged error here
> # define WINT_MIN (-1L << ( - 1)) (<=== silently borked)
> # else
This is valid ANSI C and IS
Martin Neitzel wrote:
> This is CVS on a SGI Indigo (R3000, 32bit) running IRIX-5.3 and SGI's
> commercial "IRIX Developer Option" cc (ANSI C as in ISO :1990 or
> c89).
OK, we can support this platform.
> I'm using -w2 which turns all warnings into serious errors
> requiring some treatment (just
> Does your system protect against duplication of
> types out of ?
No. Neither that nor in the other direction. The conflicting
(or rather: duplicated) typedefs are also not under control of
any conditional such as __STDC__ or whatever.
Both headers have the usual #ifndef brackets protecting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marti,
I have committed a change to CVS top-of-tree that may help you.
Does your system protect against duplication of types out
of ?
-- Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEnD0ZCg7APGsDnFERAjXSAJ9
> The lib/stdint.h which is generated on an IRIX 5.3 system should have
> all of the stuff you need without any change needed to md5.c or md5.h.
>
> If you want to checkout a copy of the vanilla CVS sources and do a quick
> configure and build to let us know of any warnings or errors you see,
> th
I'm not sure whether I should really chime in.
I'm mostly sending this stuff just because "What required for SGIs?"
w.r.t. stdint/inttypes has become a current topic and this fits in.
The recent gnulib stdint_.h changes for SGIs look promising to me.
However, it'll take some days for me to check t
This is making me more and more inclined to switch to a stdint.h
replacement, not something that tries to augment existing broken
systems. It would be much simpler to maintain, I think. I'll work on
a proposal and try to have something ready in a day or two.
Hi Martin,
The CVS project has forked from the GNULIB project slightly for the
stdint stuff as I have not seen any commit to gnulib to support the SGI
compilation problems we had observed. I have hopes that they will either
adopt our changes or equivalent changes so that we can once more use
their
15 matches
Mail list logo
