Re: [PATCH] Revert part of f406941a8a2ec

2015-10-06 Thread Paul Eggert
On 10/06/2015 05:23 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Nowadays, anyone should be simply using utf-8 encoding for their own sake, and for developers there isn't any excuse not to do that. Although I agree with you, a few Emacs developers still occasionally edit source code in 8-bit locales

Re: [PATCH] Revert part of f406941a8a2ec

2015-10-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:48:45AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Thanks, instead of reverting I'd rather fix the bug. I assume the > attached patch does that; if not please let me know. Looks like it should work. BTW., is it really worth to do anything for the motivation given in original patch (t

Re: [PATCH] Revert part of f406941a8a2ec

2015-10-06 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks, instead of reverting I'd rather fix the bug. I assume the attached patch does that; if not please let me know. From 0bb9ebe5c7fed1275a188fe53a23c6504e9eeb13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 00:46:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] unicase/locale-language: fix typo

[PATCH] Revert part of f406941a8a2ec

2015-10-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Build fails with: ./unicase/locale-languages.gperf:271: declarations are not allowed in the keywords section. To declare a keyword starting with %, enclose it in double-quotes. (On Fedora 24 rawhide) --- lib/unicase/locale-languages.gperf | 7 --- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/