Hi again,
OK, so everything in it's own file...
Question:
For testing I fetched the rand48 module into my project and stdlib.h
contains a line
# if addr...@hidden@
and gcc complains about it:
./stdlib.h:273:6: error: "address" is not defined
./stdlib.h:273:13: error: token "@" is not valid i
Hi gnulibrarians!
New question toards the drand48 issue.
Message
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2008-11/msg00031.html
states, that we should use the same file names as in glibc. The patch of
richard is all in one file. Is it enough to put a line to each function,
saying where it
Hi again!
I assume everybody still remembers the drand48 issue ;-)
I just had the time to dive into Richards code and the comments on it.
Would'nt it be easier to fetch the whole thing from glibc again? Instead
of pulling Richards code apart and placing everything back where it came
from?
Or
Hi again,
Richard Jones has proposed such a module for gnulib already [1] in last
October, and it needs only a bit of source code polishing [2] until it can
be included in gnulib.
Bruno
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2008-10/msg00550.html
[2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html
Hi again,
so how am I supposed to get Richard's code? Just patch my own copy of
the public Gnulib repository? And then the task is to apply the
comments from the post to it? I think this should be feasible...I just
need a little bit of time for it.
I still have a question on licensing. As f
