Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module

2016-09-05 Thread Jim Meyering
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >> On Saturday, 3 September 2016 20:47:15 CEST Jim Meyering wrote: > ... >> Another thing: should some deprecation warning/note be added regarding >> the progname module? > > I like the idea

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module

2016-09-05 Thread Jim Meyering
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Saturday, 3 September 2016 20:47:15 CEST Jim Meyering wrote: ... > Another thing: should some deprecation warning/note be added regarding > the progname module? I like the idea of adding a deprecation warning. If it could be completely repl

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module

2016-09-05 Thread Pino Toscano
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 20:47:15 CEST Jim Meyering wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > > as discussed in [1], this series adds a new getprogname module. > > All it does is providing a getprogname function, much like what is > > found on e.g. *BSD systems, and usin