Re: gnulib and i18n

2012-09-02 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: >>> Should gnulib generate .pot and maintain its own translations? >> >> That's been proposed, yes, but nobody's gotten around to doing >> it. > > I take it that the project is not ag

Re: gnulib and i18n

2012-09-02 Thread Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: >> Should gnulib generate .pot and maintain its own translations? > > That's been proposed, yes, but nobody's gotten around to doing > it. I take it that the project is not against to such changes if someone does it. > Translators have to deal w

Re: stat-time.h vs. -Waggregate-return

2012-09-02 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Eric Blake writes: >>> On 08/02/2012 04:49 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: On 08/02/2012 03:40 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > /* Store *ST's access time into *TS. */ > static inline void > get_stat_atime (struct stat const *st, struct timespec *ts)

encapsulating --enable-gcc-warnings [Re: [PATCH] build: work with new glibc when not optimizing

2012-09-02 Thread Jim Meyering
[cc'ing bug-gnulib] This started with a useful coreutils patch by Eric, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.general/3164 The thing is, it belongs in nearly every project that also provides the configure-time --enable-gcc-warnings option: Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sat, Sep 1, 20