In message <4be03f2d.7090...@redhat.com>, Eric Blake writes:
>As original author, you get to choose the license that will be used
>within gnulib. I see nothing wrong with you declaring that the
>setproctitle module is LGPLv2+.
Ahh, okay.
That said, the more I look at this, the less sure I am tha
In message , "Alfred M. Szmidt" writes:
>If the FSF is the copyright holder, then there is no (legal) need to
>ask the original author about permission to relicense the work. It
>might be a nice thing to do, but if the original author says no for
>some reason, the FSF can still relicense the work;
>> Can you simply declare the copyright to be LGPLv2+? Many
>> modules are already LGPLv2+ (see modules/*).
>
> I could if I were just releasing the code myself, but if the FSF
> needs a copyright assignment, does that not imply that I no
> longer get to choose the copyright?
On 05/04/2010 09:21 AM, Peter Seebach wrote:
> In message <87r5lr51hh@meyering.net>, Jim Meyering writes:
>> Can you simply declare the copyright to be LGPLv2+?
>> Many modules are already LGPLv2+ (see modules/*).
>
> I could if I were just releasing the code myself, but if the FSF needs
> a c
In message <87r5lr51hh@meyering.net>, Jim Meyering writes:
>Can you simply declare the copyright to be LGPLv2+?
>Many modules are already LGPLv2+ (see modules/*).
I could if I were just releasing the code myself, but if the FSF needs
a copyright assignment, does that not imply that I no longer
* doc/posix-functions/wctob.texi (wctob): Cygwin 1.7.6 will fix
this bug.
* doc/glibc-functions/get_nprocs_conf.texi (get_nprocs_conf):
Added in cygwin 1.7.2.
* doc/glibc-functions/get_phys_pages.texi (get_phys_pages):
Likewise.
* doc/glibc-functions/get_avphys_pages.texi (get_avphys_pages):
Likewi
Peter Seebach wrote:
> In message <87hbmo5fzq@meyering.net>, Jim Meyering writes:
>>Thanks for volunteering. Yes, this would be useful.
>>There are many implementations floating around.
>
> There are indeed a ton.
>
>>Can you assign copyright to the FSF?
>
> I think I can. There is some ambi
Peter Seebach wrote:
> Is there any interest in attempting to provide a moderately portable
> setproctitle()?
Yes, because it looks like a portable implementation will have to use
different approaches on different platforms. [1] has the following:
- use the function setproctitle.
- use pstat(P
One more piece required.
Without this, "gendocs.sh -s $(srcdir)/diff.texi" continued to try to
use names like diffutils.info, while only "diff.info" was generated.
>From cbbec352566be60d2ede1ee43f6bc911e547d8b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:43:05 +0200
Subje
In message <87hbmo5fzq@meyering.net>, Jim Meyering writes:
>Thanks for volunteering. Yes, this would be useful.
>There are many implementations floating around.
There are indeed a ton.
>Can you assign copyright to the FSF?
I think I can. There is some ambiguity about the IP agreement at $d
10 matches
Mail list logo
