According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/13/2008 2:45 PM:
Weird. So Irix 5.3 has sigaction, but not sa_sigaction? Can you please
post the definition of struct sigaction from ?
From :
typedef struct sigaction {
int sa_flags; /* see below for values */
__si
Karl, I think that using the option --git-urls instead of --cvs-urls should
fix this.
Thanks. I changed the cron. We'll see what happens tonight ...
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:05:53AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/9/2008 6:41 AM:
>
> Hello Tom,
>
> |
> | On Irix 6.5.30 I see gnulib test failures:
> | ./test-c-stack.sh[7]: 12954353 Memory fault(coredump)
> | FAIL: test-c-stack.sh
> | FAIL: test-c-stack2.sh
>
Hello Eric,
I build now with --without-libsigsegv-prefix
I attach resulst
Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Elbert Pol on 8/11/2008 1:51 PM:
| Thanks for your updated reports. It looks like libsigsegv won't help you
| unless you find someone willing
Le mercredi 13 août 2008 à 11:59 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit :
> Hello Yoann,
>
> > I'm wondering whether there is a problem with the last set of patch I
> > sent you on the mailing list, that may prevent you from checking them
> > in?
>
> Sorry, I had zero time from Friday to Monday.
>
> Your p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/9/2008 6:41 AM:
Hello Tom,
Thanks for the report, and sorry for my delay in responding,
|
| On Irix 6.5.30 I see gnulib test failures:
| ./test-c-stack.sh[7]: 12954353 Memory fault(coredump)
| FAIL: test-c-stack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Simon Josefsson on 8/13/2008 4:59 AM:
| Is there a sort option that results in the output being something like
| the below?
|
| libnsl solaris-2.4
| libcsolaris-2.5.1
| libnsl solar
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libcsolaris-2.10
> libnsl solaris-2.10
> libnsl solaris-2.4
> libcsolaris-2.5.1
> libnsl solaris-2.5.1
...
> -| sed -e 's,^\(\) *,\1,' | so
Hello Yoann,
> I'm wondering whether there is a problem with the last set of patch I
> sent you on the mailing list, that may prevent you from checking them
> in?
Sorry, I had zero time from Friday to Monday.
Your patch looks quite good. Thanks for the many updates. (Only the test-lock
part has
Hello Ben,
> I missed seeing that in the "show-portability" output, even
> though it was right there. I think that part of the reason was
> that the output is grouped by library. When I adjust the sorting
> to be by OS, it is easier for me to see that ...
> ...
> --- tmp/various-symlists/show-po
10 matches
Mail list logo
