Le mercredi 13 août 2008 à 11:59 +0200, Bruno Haible a écrit : > Hello Yoann, > > > I'm wondering whether there is a problem with the last set of patch I > > sent you on the mailing list, that may prevent you from checking them > > in? > > Sorry, I had zero time from Friday to Monday. > > Your patch looks quite good. Thanks for the many updates. (Only the test-lock > part has useless reformatting.) > > But the major points I'm still hesitating about are: > - What about the module for the sched_yield function, which is mandatory > for code that runs with GNU Pth? Do you write it, or should I write it?
I can take care of this one, > - 'gl' prefix of the module names? I vote for no, since all modules are > gnulib modules, and it's thus redundant. > - 'gl' prefix of the header files? You are right that because of > Solaris <thread.h> "it make sense to use glcond / gllock to use the same > convention everywhere". But I have a bad feeling about such a renaming. > Can you see alternatives? Maybe something like <glthread/lock.h>, > <glthread/tls.h>, <glthread/thread.h>, <glthread/cond.h>, > <glthread/yield.h> ? Look good to me, can you handle the renaming part so that all the modules look consistant? -- Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
