On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:03:12 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Personally I agree with you that it's more convenient when isfinite
>> does not raise an exception. But the bottom line is that portable
>> code can't assume that isfinite(sNaN) will return 0 without raising an
>> exception.
>>
>
>I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[adding the austin group]
According to Paul Eggert on 10/24/2007 4:16 PM:
* Is it acceptable for isfinite to raise an exception on
a signaling NaN?
>>> Yes.
>> I disagree. We know what the relevant standards say: [1]
>> [1]
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> > * Is it acceptable for isfinite to raise an exception on
>> > a signaling NaN?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> I disagree. We know what the relevant standards say: [1]
> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuli
Sam Steingold wrote:
> diff -u gnulib/tests/uniname/UnicodeDataNames.txt
> clisp/current/utils/unicode/UnicodeDataFull.txt | wc
>5887 24682 319494
> which file is correct?
The one in gnulib is more recent.
> are you going to move clisp/current/utils/unicode/ to gnulib completely?
The gen
_Currently_?
Bruno, I agree with you that there's no reason not to list, on the web
page, all and only the active contributors, instead of the official
maintainers. I changed the list on the web page.
Simon, Eric -- if you would like to be dubbed official maintainers of
gnulib, let me kno
He also said he'd update the maintain.texi file at some point, but I
don't see anything at http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html,
I guess "some point" hasn't arrived yet :). I'll try to do it soon.
I'd also like to see it at
http://www.gnu.org/server/fsf-html-style-sheet
Hello,
On Tru64 4.0D, /usr/include.dtk/math.h declares round, roundf and
roundl, but I can't find a library that defines them. Same thing for
roundf and roundl and respective tests.
This causes link failures for the test-round* tests:
| source='../../dummy-0/gltests/test-round1.c' object='test-
FYI,
ChangeLog | 10 ++
build-aux/bootstrap | 19 +++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 3ed561c..177b87b 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2007-10-24 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTE
* Sam Steingold wrote on Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:35:21PM CEST:
> 1. should I always invoke automake with --add-missing?
No, once is sufficient.
> 2. will automake notice that it has a newer version of something for
> build-aux and tell me or do I need to check that myself every once in a
> while?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eric Blake wrote:
According to Paul Eggert on 10/24/2007 1:22 AM:
> > Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Rather than inlining this text, shouldn't you have used the magic:
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Most likely, yes. But where's the source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> * Sam Steingold wrote on Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:08:49PM CEST:
>> I just did
>>
>> gnulib-tool --import --source-base=src/gllib \
>> --m4-base=src/glm4 --aux-dir=src/build-aux --no-changelog \
>> stdint stdbool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno,
diff -u gnulib/tests/uniname/UnicodeDataNames.txt
clisp/current/utils/unicode/UnicodeDataFull.txt | wc
5887 24682 319494
which file is correct?
are you going to move clisp/current/utils/unicode/ to gnulib completely?
Thanks
Sam.
-BEGIN
Hello Sam,
* Sam Steingold wrote on Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:08:49PM CEST:
>
> I just did
>
> gnulib-tool --import --source-base=src/gllib \
> --m4-base=src/glm4 --aux-dir=src/build-aux --no-changelog \
> stdint stdbool regex fnmatch-gnu havelib gettext localcharset \
> uniwidth/width streq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just did
gnulib-tool --import --source-base=src/gllib \
--m4-base=src/glm4 --aux-dir=src/build-aux --no-changelog \
stdint stdbool regex fnmatch-gnu havelib gettext localcharset \
uniwidth/width streq uniname/uniname unitypes
cd src; automake g
Benoit SIGOURE wrote:
[CC: Git-ML]
On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Index: gnulib.html
===
RCS file: /web/gnulib/gnulib/gn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Clytie Siddall on 10/24/2007 2:37 AM:
>
> 2.
>
> #: lib/gai_strerror.c:52
> msgid "Servname not supported for ai_socktype"
>
> "Servname" is ambiguous: "Service name" or "Server name"? You may well
> get inaccurate translations.
Simon?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 10/24/2007 4:51 AM:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>>> * Is it acceptable for isfinite to raise an exception on
>>> a signaling NaN?
>> Yes.
>
> I disagree. We know what the relevant standards say: [1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 10/24/2007 4:29 AM:
>
> But since here it's about the web pages, i.e. the public's notion of
> maintainers, not about RMS's notion of "maintainers", I'm in favour of
> changing the web pages to reflect the maintainers by c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Paul Eggert on 10/24/2007 1:22 AM:
> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Rather than inlining this text, shouldn't you have used the magic:
>>
>>
>
> Most likely, yes. But where's the source to the boilerplate that
> includes t
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > #if ! (-2147483648LL < 0)
> > ...
> > #if ! (-9223372036854775807LL < 0)
>
> If a compiler can't handle that sort of line, then its bugs are more
> serious, since it's relatively common to do preprocessor checks
> like "#if LLONG
Hi Ben,
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > * Is it acceptable for isfinite to raise an exception on
> > a signaling NaN?
>
> Yes.
I disagree. We know what the relevant standards say: [1]
Also there is the issue with numbers outside the IEEE spec: [2]
Since this is a classification function
Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> + Gnulib is currently being maintained by
>
> > _Currently_? Counting the number of people who have contributed more than
> > 10 ChangeLog entries
>
> As I understand it the "Maintainers" entry is for the official
> maintainers, which is sometimes distinct from the people
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rather than inlining this text, shouldn't you have used the magic:
>
>
Most likely, yes. But where's the source to the boilerplate that
includes this magic? I used http://www.gnu.org/boilerplate.html,
which has the magic already expanded. I couldn't fi
[CC: Git-ML]
On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Index: gnulib.html
===
RCS file: /web/gnulib/gnulib/gnulib.html,v
retrieving
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In general, if you control the server repo,
> you can simply add a symlink in project.git:
>
> .git -> ..
I meant this:
.git -> .
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> + Gnulib is currently being maintained by
> _Currently_? Counting the number of people who have contributed more than
> 10 ChangeLog entries
As I understand it the "Maintainers" entry is for the official
maintainers, which is sometimes distinct from th
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> #if ! (-2147483648LL < 0)
> ...
> #if ! (-9223372036854775807LL < 0)
If a compiler can't handle that sort of line, then its bugs are more
serious, since it's relatively common to do preprocessor checks
like "#if LLONG_MIN < LONG_MIN".
How about this ide
Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
>> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Because the CVS mirror at cvs.sv.gnu.org is no longer maintained:
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-09/msg00137.html
>>
>> To help imp
Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/gnulib.git
>> +git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/gnulib
>>
>>
>
> Is there any reason why this has changed?
It was to match what was in the README file for gnulib.
> I learned (the hard way) that for bare pu
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Is it acceptable for isfinite to raise an exception on
> a signaling NaN?
Yes.
> * Is it acceptable to #include in and put
> inline functions in math.in.h?
Yes, to both. Of course 'inline' needs to be configured.
B
30 matches
Mail list logo
