Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

2007-10-01 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's the updated file list: Thanks. ... > lib/stdint.in.h modules/stdint says: License: LGPLv2+ I need stdint in libidn. > lib/sys_socket.in.h > lib/sys_stat.in.h > lib/unistd.in.h I need those in the core GnuTLS library, and they all seem to be

Re: git: avoiding merges, rebasing

2007-10-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, > $ git stash > $ git fetch > $ git rebase origin/master > $ git stash apply > > $ git stash clear > $ git reset Note that "git stash clear" is a dangerous command. I recommend to use it only after "git stash list" and/or "git status". I just did this: $ git stash $ g

Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

2007-10-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Simon Josefsson wrote: > For example, arctwo and arcfour are marked as 'LGPLv2+' in the > modules file, which as far as I understand would mean that they would > not be included in your update, but still you include it: > > > lib/arcfour.c > > lib/arcfour.h > > lib/arctwo.c > > lib/arctwo.h > > I

Re: relocatable-prog missing dependency to alloca

2007-10-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Missing dependency: I imported the 'relocatable-prog' module in an > empty project. It lacked the 'alloca' module dependency (although it > imported 'alloca-opt'): > > $ sh bootstrap > + autoreconf --install --symlink --warnings=all > /usr/share/aclocal/smpeg.m4:13: warnin

Re: LGPLv2.5

2007-10-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Karl, > 2) Assuming that is not imminent, we are contemplating changing the >licensing for most gnulib files to GPLv3+/LGPLv3+. Any reactions? This is unrelated to LGPLv2.5. (I shouldn't have mentioned the two independent topics in a single mail; my bad.) If LGPLv2.5 comes to exist, it m

Re: underscores in gnulib file names

2007-10-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Committed. > 2007-09-30 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * lib/alloca.in.h: Renamed from lib/alloca_.h. > * lib/argz.in.h: Renamed from lib/argz_.h. > * lib/byteswap.in.h: Renamed from lib/byteswap_.h. > * lib/dirent.in.h: Renamed from lib/dirent_.h. > * lib/fc

LGPLv2.5

2007-10-01 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Brett, 1) Are there still plans for LGPL v2.5, or is that effectively dead? 2) Assuming that is not imminent, we are contemplating changing the licensing for most gnulib files to GPLv3+/LGPLv3+. Any reactions? Thanks, Karl

Re: gnulib request

2007-10-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Sean Boudreau wrote: > They're non standard and present challenges in the portability department > so if they aren't needed the less they're referenced the better. I agree with you. We considered this point. (For example, there is a way to implement the 'close-stream' module with fpending and one

Re: move-if-change

2007-10-01 Thread Paul Eggert
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I've checked this in anyways: > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commit;h=da27171 I suspect that nobody needs it nowadays; in that case it might be better to omit it from gnulib, as it might confuse people into thinking that it's useful.

relocatable-prog missing dependency to alloca

2007-10-01 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, Missing dependency: I imported the 'relocatable-prog' module in an empty project. It lacked the 'alloca' module dependency (although it imported 'alloca-opt'): $ sh bootstrap + autoreconf --install --symlink --warnings=all /usr/share/aclocal/smpeg.m4:13: warning: underquoted definition of A

Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

2007-10-01 Thread Simon Josefsson
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Three months have passed since the announcement of the desire to switch > to GPLv3 and LGPLv3 respectively. We have discussed the topic, and marked > exceptions as "LGPLv2+" in the modules files. There were discussions > about a possible LGPLv2.5

Re: Fwd: Re: error.c: "Unknown system error" should report errno value

2007-10-01 Thread Martin Koeppe
Hi Eric, On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Martin Koeppe on 9/30/2007 9:38 AM: where do I find test-strerror.c? I looked in the coreutils snapshot and in gnulib cvs to no avail. Which cvs repository? Gnulib is now stored in g

Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

2007-10-01 Thread Paul Eggert
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Now I propose to change the documented meaning of "GPL" and "LGPL" in >> the modules files (to GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+, respectively), and to update >> the copyright headers of the following files. >> >> Objections? > > None from me. > I've always been in fav

Re: gnulib request

2007-10-01 Thread Sean Boudreau
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 06:51:04PM -0400, Eric Blake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to Sean Boudreau on 9/30/2007 4:10 PM: > > Hello: > > Hello Sean, and adding bug-gnulib, > > > > > Would it be possible to not bring in freading.c and fpurge.c > > and to

Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

2007-10-01 Thread Ben Pfaff
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now I propose to change the documented meaning of "GPL" and "LGPL" in > the modules files (to GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+, respectively), and to update > the copyright headers of the following files. Regarding the files in which I have or share maintainership, I

Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

2007-10-01 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Three months have passed since the announcement of the desire to switch > to GPLv3 and LGPLv3 respectively. We have discussed the topic, and marked > exceptions as "LGPLv2+" in the modules files. There were discussions > about a possible LGPLv2.5 but it has

switch to (L)GPLv3

2007-10-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, Three months have passed since the announcement of the desire to switch to GPLv3 and LGPLv3 respectively. We have discussed the topic, and marked exceptions as "LGPLv2+" in the modules files. There were discussions about a possible LGPLv2.5 but it has apparently not materialized. Now I propos