Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Three months have passed since the announcement of the desire to switch > to GPLv3 and LGPLv3 respectively. We have discussed the topic, and marked > exceptions as "LGPLv2+" in the modules files. There were discussions > about a possible LGPLv2.5 but it has apparently not materialized. > > Now I propose to change the documented meaning of "GPL" and "LGPL" in > the modules files (to GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+, respectively), and to update > the copyright headers of the following files. > > Objections?
I don't object in general, although your list seems to contain some flaws. For example, arctwo and arcfour are marked as 'LGPLv2+' in the modules file, which as far as I understand would mean that they would not be included in your update, but still you include it: > lib/arcfour.c > lib/arcfour.h > lib/arctwo.c > lib/arctwo.h I didn't look further in the list, since I assume there is some systematic flaw in the algorithm that produce the list. If you prepare a new list I'll look through it to make sure none of the LGPLv2+'d modules that my LGPLv2+'d GNU projects need. /Simon
