Hi Didier,
Didier Link skribis:
> I've just released a gnu-ghostscript point release with the CVE patches
> adapted by Mark (really thanks !!!).
Thank you!
> For the CVE-2016-7977 I've see that the file concerned was modified in
> later release of gpl-ghostscript, I will see in later release o
Le 16/10/2016 à 17:47, Alex Vong a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I notice the patch for CVE-2016-7977[0] handles the problem differently
> than GNU Ghostscript[1] does. Maybe you can take a look at it.
>
> [0]:
> http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8abd22010eb4db0fb1b10e430d5f5d83e015
Hello,
I notice the patch for CVE-2016-7977[0] handles the problem differently
than GNU Ghostscript[1] does. Maybe you can take a look at it.
[0]:
http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8abd22010eb4db0fb1b10e430d5f5d83e015ef70
[1]: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/ghostscript.
Hello all
I will review the Mark's patches and apply them for a security release
next week.
Thanks for your help !
Best regards
Didier
Le 15/10/2016 à 09:36, Mark H Weaver a écrit :
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hello Didier and all,
>>
>> We are wondering about the applicabi
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Didier and all,
>
> We are wondering about the applicability to GNU Ghostscript of the
> recent vulnerabilities discovered in AGPL Ghostscript:
>
> Alex Vong skribis:
>
>> Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
>>
>>> -
Hello Didier and all,
We are wondering about the applicability to GNU Ghostscript of the
recent vulnerabilities discovered in AGPL Ghostscript:
Alex Vong skribis:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
>
>> -
>> Debian Security Ad
