XML-like date/time support ?

2006-01-08 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
ight now every country has its own incompatible convention. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

2006-01-08 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 19:35 +, Philip Rowlands a écrit : > On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > The XML folks have defined a single common international date/time > > format people can actually use : > > http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime &g

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

2006-01-08 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 22:15 +0100, Jim Meyering a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The full format used in the note, save the fractional part of a second, > >> can be specified as: > >> > >> $ date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H-%M-

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

2006-01-08 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 16:24 -0800, Paul Eggert a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The XML folks have defined a single common international date/time > > format > > I just looked at <http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime> and

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

2006-01-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 18:14 -0800, Paul Eggert a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/> > > > Yep, the xml schema is the official specification from hell everyone > > wants to forget >

Re: XML-like date/time support ?

2006-01-11 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
On Mer 11 janvier 2006 01:41, Paul Eggert wrote: > Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20011203.html > > This doesn't seem to say anything about dates or times. Is there > some spec based on Relax N

bug#34700: rm refuses to remove files owned by the user, even in force mode

2019-03-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
pm -q --whatprovides /usr/bin/rm coreutils-8.30-9.fc30.x86_64 Best regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

bug#34700: rm refuses to remove files owned by the user, even in force mode

2019-03-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
ou-own-the-file (IIRC vi also ignores permissions in force mode). So could a really-force flag be added? Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

bug#34700: rm refuses to remove files owned by the user, even in force mode

2019-03-03 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
s, and code that attempts to manipulate zip files as if they were directories fails badly As one of the Go devs commented in one of the tickets after arguing for the ro change "I'm surprised rm is not smart enough to do the right thing" (meaning remove everything when asked without requiring a permission change, since the user owns everything) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

bug#35032: date ISO 8601 / RFC 3339 formats

2019-03-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
ld it be possible to make them both optional in --rfc-3339, and both mandatory in --iso-8601 ? Or add a --w3c option that conforms to the W3C profile? This is all so sad… Some languages like Go do no understand neither of date's output, because they follow the W3C profile. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

bug#35032: date ISO 8601 / RFC 3339 formats

2019-03-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
19-03-29T09:54:41+01:00 Which is W3C compliant. So it seems someone already reported the problem in the past, and it has already been fixed. A lot of thanks to the person who did the fix and the person who reported the problem before me, whoever they are. And thanks to Eric for clarifying my report The bug can be closed. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot