Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 22:15 +0100, Jim Meyering a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The full format used in the note, save the fractional part of a second, > >> can be specified as: > >> > >> $ date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H-%M-%S%:z' > >> 2006-01-08T19-29-44+00:00 > > > > It's a pity about the fractional part - it's useful when you need to > > generate unique identifiers. > > Doesn't %N do what you want? > > %N nanoseconds (000000000..999999999)
Right, didn't realise there was enough zeros to reach the seconds ;) > > Maybe a --iso-8601, --w3c or --xml flag would be in order ? > > From --help output: > > --rfc-3339=TIMESPEC output date and time in RFC 3339 format. > TIMESPEC=`date', `seconds', or `ns' for > date and time to the indicated precision. > > E.g., > > $ date --rfc-3339=ns > 2006-01-08 22:14:12.196485000+01:00 This is not exactly the same format. W3C format would be 2006-01-08T22:14:12.196485000+01:00 (no space, much better for loads of stupid scripts) And combined with -u it would give 2006-01-08T22:14:12.196485000Z not 2006-01-08 22:14:12.196485000+00:00 Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
