I got an error in `make check' in this snapshot:
,
| make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/coreutils-6.10.156-0ec48/tests/mkdir'
| make check-TESTS
| make[4]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/coreutils-6.10.156-0ec48/tests/mkdir'
| make[5]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/coreut
I'm planning to make a release soon, maybe in the next week,
so here's a snapshot of the current state:
coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz8.8 MB
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.lzma 3.6 MB
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz.sig
http:
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:49:35PM CET:
>> -dist_man_MANS = $(MAN)
>> +# We must include at least one literal name here, so that
>> +# automake-1.10.1 emits the required install-man* rules.
>> +dist_man_MANS = rm.1 $(MAN)
>
> You can
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:49:35PM CET:
> -dist_man_MANS = $(MAN)
> +# We must include at least one literal name here, so that
> +# automake-1.10.1 emits the required install-man* rules.
> +dist_man_MANS = rm.1 $(MAN)
You can instead also just s/dist_man_MANS/dist_man
"Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> "Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:27:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> >> There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
>> >
>>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:27:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
> >
> > Something odd happened with generated man/Makefil
"Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:27:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
>
> Something odd happened with generated man/Makefile.in file,
> it is no longer going to build and install manpages because
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:27:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
Something odd happened with generated man/Makefile.in file,
it is no longer going to build and install manpages because all
corresponding code is absent in the new version:
There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so...
coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz8.9 MB
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.lzma 3.6 MB
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz.sig
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.lzma.si
My big test factorization changes broke at least two tests.
Thanks to Peter Fales for spotting and reporting the new failures.
Here is a new snapshot that fixes them:
coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz8.9 MB
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.lzma
Peter Fales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:11:24AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> I committed this. It should fix it. Please test it, since I don't have access
>> to a HP-UX 10 machine. To test it, create a test directory through the
>> command
>
> Thanks for the mail. The
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Paul Eggert wrote:
Martin Koeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ok, download is possible now. But seq is still wrong for me. Either
include the gnulib printf-posix module, or change seq to use
asprintf() instead of printf() to fix. See the previous mails on that
by
Martin Koeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, download is possible now. But seq is still wrong for me. Either
> include the gnulib printf-posix module, or change seq to use
> asprintf() instead of printf() to fix. See the previous mails on that
> by Bruno and me.
Can you please clarify? What I
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
Martin Koeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just wanted to download the new snapshot to make sure seq now works
for me, before the release. Unfortunately, I get "403 Permission
denied" on both
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-340-def15.tar.gz
http:/
Martin Koeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to download the new snapshot to make sure seq now works
> for me, before the release. Unfortunately, I get "403 Permission
> denied" on both
>
> http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-340-def15.tar.gz
> http://meyering.net/cu/
Hi Martin,
Than
Hi Jim,
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Bruno Haible wrote:
Martin Koeppe wrote:
The relevant output is done by asprintf(). And by printf() in line 269.
That's it. coreutils needs to use also printf-posix, not only
vasprintf-posix. Then 'seq' should work.
I just wanted to download the new snapshot
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Here's another snapshot.
>> FYI, I don't expect to make big changes before the next release[*],
>> which will be of those can't-call-it-stable-but-think-it-is ones.
>
> probably a gnulib issue, but m4/lse
On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Here's another snapshot.
> FYI, I don't expect to make big changes before the next release[*],
> which will be of those can't-call-it-stable-but-think-it-is ones.
probably a gnulib issue, but m4/lseek.m4 causes a broken pipe error to be
shown duri
Here's another snapshot.
FYI, I don't expect to make big changes before the next release[*],
which will be of those can't-call-it-stable-but-think-it-is ones.
[*] Of course, we never know... There may be two _more_ 15-year-old
bugs fixed this coming weekend, too.
Things that might be done before
The latest coreutils snapshot is here (note the new naming scheme):
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-ss.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-ss.tar.gz.sig
Those files are just links to these:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-235-4055c.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutil
Since the last snapshot, not much has changed in coreutils proper,
but some of the recent changes in gnulib that may have an effect.
2007-04-25 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* src/du.c (usage): Clarify description of --dereference-args (-D).
Prompted by a report from Justin P
Jim Meyering wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
might be useful to have some way to run the test suite in a different
directory, so that it is easy to run once on NFS and once on local. In
particular I remember that on Darwin this was important.
To build and run "make check" using various writable
Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> might be useful to have some way to run the test suite in a different
> directory, so that it is easy to run once on NFS and once on local. In
> particular I remember that on Darwin this was important.
To build and run "make check" using various writabl
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
[blah blah] it built clean, which is an improvement
over last time when as you'll recall I had problems with the strstr
declaration. I'll be pleasantly surprised if it passes 'make check'
cleanly, as that tends to hit false positives and/or kernel bugs, but
it's looking
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Last night I made another coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz.sig
aka
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz
http://meyeri
Olivier Delhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:48:08 +0100, Jim Meyering disait :
>
>> I'll stop providing them. Actually, that wouldn't be too surprising,
>> since the process of checking out the code and running "./bootstrap &&
>> ./configure && make && make dist" probably
Bauke Jan Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote on 14-02-07 14:48:
>> Last night I made another coreutils snapshot:
>> http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz
>> http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz.sig
>> aka
>> http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-
Le Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:48:08 +0100, Jim Meyering disait :
> I'll stop providing them. Actually, that wouldn't be too surprising,
> since the process of checking out the code and running "./bootstrap &&
> ./configure && make && make dist" probably works fine for most people
> who try, these days.
Jim Meyering wrote on 14-02-07 14:48:
Last night I made another coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz.sig
aka
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/
Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I, at least, appreciate them (although I admit I haven't tried the cvs
> thing on coreutils yet). I might appreciate them more if the one with
> the timestamp had a name that didn't confuse tar. :-)
Thanks for the feedback.
I'll remove the colons.
___
Jim Meyering wrote:
Last night I made another coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz.sig
aka
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-s
Last night I made another coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz.sig
aka
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+
32 matches
Mail list logo
