Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Last night I made another coreutils snapshot:

  http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz
  http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-dirty.tar.gz.sig

  aka
    http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7-ss-2007-02-14.00:04:10+0.tar.gz.sig

If you take the time to build/test, it'd be nice to let me or the list
know, even if it's just to say that everything went fine. [snip]

I'm going to give AIX another run, since I ran into problems last time.

After jumping through hoops to get configure to use -qlanglvl=extc99 (people don't want me creating a /usr/include/stdbool.h and xlc doesn't seem to pay attention to INCLUDE, I finally had to explicitly use CFLAGS=-I<path-to-stdbool.h>), it built clean, which is an improvement over last time when as you'll recall I had problems with the strstr declaration. I'll be pleasantly surprised if it passes 'make check' cleanly, as that tends to hit false positives and/or kernel bugs, but it's looking good!

Thanks again for the snapshots. :-)

--
Matthew
Patches Thoughtfully Considered -- FLOSS mantra



_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to