Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-27 Thread Jim Meyering
Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tried to subscribe using bug-coreutils-request but I get The list software's database was corrupted for a long time, but everything seems to be working now. > no response, so I'm sending this in the hope that it will reach > a useful destination noneth

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-23 Thread Hugh Sasse
I was going to send you this information before my last response, but forgot it was half composed. Maybe configure should die in this circumstance. Still if it is only for the tests, and only one fails, probably not. On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Jim Meyering wrote: > Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-23 Thread Hugh Sasse
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Jim Meyering wrote: > Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > >> Would you please run this (from the top level): > >> > >> make && env LC_ALL=C make -C tests/dd check TESTS=skip-seek [...] > > >> If the above still fails, then please run this variant, which wi

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-22 Thread Bob Proulx
Hugh Sasse wrote: > I've tried to subscribe using bug-coreutils-request but I get > no response, so I'm sending this in the hope that it will reach > a useful destination nonetheless. Thank you very much for making your report. The machine hosting the mailing list had hardware problems. This cas

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> Would you please run this (from the top level): >> >> make && env LC_ALL=C make -C tests/dd check TESTS=skip-seek >> >> If that succeeds, then we'll know that the problem is locale-related, >> making dd's use of ngettext malfunction. Did you try the a

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-22 Thread Hugh Sasse
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Eric Blake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to Hugh Sasse on 3/22/2006 2:50 AM: > > > > Anything else I can tell you? > > Try running 'make -C tests/dd TESTS=skip-seek DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes check' > so we can see exactly what the testsu

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> > *** block-sync-1.E Thu Mar 9 18:50:30 2006 >> > --- block-sync-1.3 Thu Mar 9 18:50:30 2006 >> > *** >> > *** 1,3 >> > 2+1 records in >> > 0+1 records out >> > ! 1 truncated records >> > --- 1,3 >> > 2+1 records i

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-22 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Hugh Sasse on 3/22/2006 2:50 AM: > >> That difference implies your test is running >> the wrong dd binary. That could be because >> the PATH setting (original is in Makefile.am in that directory) >> is not being honored by your make prog

Re: Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-22 Thread Hugh Sasse
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Jim Meyering wrote: > Hugh Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've tried to subscribe using bug-coreutils-request but I get > > The list software's database was corrupted for a long time, but > everything seems to be working now. > > > no response, so I'm sending this in t

Bug report (as s/w requests).

2006-03-21 Thread Hugh Sasse
I've tried to subscribe using bug-coreutils-request but I get no response, so I'm sending this in the hope that it will reach a useful destination nonetheless. PASS: not-rewound -: test block-sync-1: stderr mismatch, comparing block-sync-1.E (actual) and block-sync-1.3 (expected) *** block-sync-1