Hugh Sasse wrote:
> I've tried to subscribe using bug-coreutils-request but I get
> no response, so I'm sending this in the hope that it will reach
> a useful destination nonetheless.

Thank you very much for making your report.  The machine hosting the
mailing list had hardware problems.  This cascaded into file
corruption and it took down the mailing list for way too many days.
It seems to finally be back online now.  We appreciate your patience.

> PASS: not-rewound
> -: test block-sync-1: stderr mismatch, comparing block-sync-1.E (actual) and 
> block-sync-1.3 (expected)
> *** block-sync-1.E      Thu Mar  9 18:50:30 2006
> --- block-sync-1.3      Thu Mar  9 18:50:30 2006
> ***************
> *** 1,3 ****
>   2+1 records in
>   0+1 records out
> ! 1 truncated records
> --- 1,3 ----
>   2+1 records in
>   0+1 records out
> ! 1 truncated record
> FAIL: skip-seek
> PASS: skip-seek2
> 3+1 records in
> 0+1 records out
> 18 bytes (18 B) copied, 0.000685894 seconds, 26.2 kB/s
> PASS: unblock-sync
> ======================================
> 1 of 5 tests failed
> Please report to bug-coreutils@gnu.org

What version of coreutils is this for?  Actually, the debug output
will provide that.

> The only difference I can see is that record is singular in one case.
> This is on a Sun, Sparc, Solaris 2.9 if that helps

Just to cover all of the bases would you be so kind as to run the
following command and to send the output to the mailing list?

  env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check -C tests/dd TESTS=not-rewound

Thanks
Bob


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to