https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28791
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28791
--- Comment #7 from Pete Moore ---
Hi Nick,
Many thanks for this patch. I think you're right, it is a reasonable
compromise, in that it increases coverage of overflow detection, without
introducing false positives. The remaining cases that ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27217
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--- Comment
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Consider the following assembly:
```
$ cat adrp.s
.global _start
_start: adrp x0, 0x8000
```
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31228
--- Comment #2 from Pete Moore ---
Many thanks Nick for quick response! Sorry for not testing on 2.41 before, I
should have done that.
On that note, I just went to test this on 2.41 and hit the issue described in
bug 30703 comment 16...
Than
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
Target Milestone: ---
GNU gas 2.32 considers that the A64 instruction stclrb instruction is not
supported on cortex-a53, however this di
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25332
--- Comment #1 from Pete Moore ---
Digging a little deeper, it looks like this instruction is part of
"ARMv8.1-LSE, Armv8.1 Large System Extensions".
>From the Arm Cortex-A53 MPCore Processor Technical Reference Manual, it isn't
clear to me i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25332
--- Comment #3 from Pete Moore ---
Many thanks Tamar!
I've also just now seen in the description of MIDR_EL1 in the TRM, that the
"Variant" is 0, which I guess also suggests v0(?)
Thanks for following up so quickly, and again sorry for the n
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
Target Milestone: ---
The gas docs provide an example in the decimal integers definition which is
invalid (0123456789). Decimal integers cannot start with a leading 0, a leading
0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25418
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25418
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
Target Milestone: ---
I believe that target z80-unknown-elf should support bss sections, but
currently does not.
Using https://ftpmirror.gnu.org/binutils/binutils-2.35.1.tar.gz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||z80-unknown-elf
--
You are receiving th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergey.belyashov at gmail dot
com
--
Y
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bss section not supported |.bss pseudo operation not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
--- Comment #8 from Pete Moore ---
Many thanks Sergey and Nick!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
CC: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: z80-unknown-elf
```
$ # GAS version
$ z80-unknown
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3136
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823
--- Comment #2 from Pete Moore ---
Many thanks Sergey!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823
--- Comment #3 from Pete Moore ---
Hi Sergey,
Do you know what the next steps are to get your patch reviewed/landed?
Does it need to be sent to gdb-patc...@sourceware.org?
Thanks!
Pete
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
ormal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
CC: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: z80-unknown-elf
The Z80 CPU User Manual
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27848
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|gas
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25235
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--- Comment #3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27848
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
verity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
CC: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: z80-unknown-elf
```
$ # GAS version
$ z80-u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27878
--- Comment #1 from Pete Moore ---
Interestingly, the assembler will fail if the out-of-range value comes from a
label rather than an explicitly specified constant in the assembly source code:
```
$ cat test.asm
.org 0x1232 ; value cho
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27878
--- Comment #3 from Pete Moore ---
Sergey, you are amazing!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27878
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25235
--- Comment #7 from Pete Moore ---
Many thanks Tamar! :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
CC: nickc at redhat dot com, sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13898
--> ht
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762
--- Comment #1 from Pete Moore ---
Note, I didn't include all the output from all examples, but all of these
actions were successful in removing the failure message:
1) Adding a blank line _anywhere_ before line 10290
2) Deleting any existing
||
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--- Comment #2 from Pete Moore ---
Created attachment 13900
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13900&action=edit
rom1.s
Apologies, I uploaded incorrect version before!
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.36.1 |2.37
--- Comment #3 from Pete Moore ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762
--- Comment #7 from Pete Moore ---
This is great, many thanks Sergey!
Now I'm curious, I noticed if I introduced changes on a completely different
line, the problem would go away, e.g. if I made a change around line 1000, the
problem report o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762
--- Comment #8 from Pete Moore ---
Ah, I think I see! The (output?) buffer is 32Kb, so this was happening at a
32Kb boundary, so almost any change would move this condition away from the
32Kb boundary...
I'm guessing it is the output buffer t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762
--- Comment #10 from Pete Moore ---
Makes perfect sense, many thanks Sergey!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: petemoore at gmx dot net
CC: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Build: 2.37
Unexpected assembly warning in z80-unknown-elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28791
--- Comment #1 from Pete Moore ---
In case it helps with reproducing the test results, these are the docker files
I used for testing on Linux:
```
pmoore@Petes-iMac:~/tmp $ cat z80-unknown-elf-as-2.36.1.Dockerfile
FROM ubuntu:20.04
RUN apt-g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28791
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petemoore at gmx dot net
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27878
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28791
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28791
--- Comment #4 from Pete Moore ---
git bisect completed:
```
9a01ec4c0368048fb5ea1ba1b3af9afbd651b529 is the first bad commit
commit 9a01ec4c0368048fb5ea1ba1b3af9afbd651b529
Author: Sergey Belyashov
Date: Thu May 20 16:14:10 2021 +0100
44 matches
Mail list logo
