--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-08 09:37
---
Created an attachment (id=399)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=399&action=view)
Proposed patch
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=698
--- You are re
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-08 09:36
---
Hi Peter,
Thanks for supplying a test case. Unfortunatley it does not compile as it
needs a header file SDL.h which was not supplied and it uses a function
SDL_LoadBMP which does not appear to be in the
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-11 17:58
---
Created an attachment (id=404)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=404&action=view)
Proposed fix
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=716
--- You are re
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-11 17:57
---
Hi Jan,
Please try the attached patch which should fix the problem.
It appears that when we copy a bfd containing PE specific data we are not
copying the contents of the pe_data structure. The patch fixes
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-14 11:20
---
Subject: Re: strip doesn't maintain /LARGEADDRESSAWARE
flag (mingw build, Windows 2000)
Hi Jan,
> Even more KISS-like:
>
> if (pe_data (obfd) != NULL && pe_data (ibfd) != NULL
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-14 11:21
---
Patch checked in
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-21 17:36
---
Subject: Re: Addr2line reports function name that is inconsistent
with file/line info for C++
Hi Fred,
> Proposed patch to fix the reported problem
This looks fine. Please apply.
If you can think of a
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-21 17:43
---
Subject: Re: New: --image-base / --enable-auto-image-base silently
disregarded if .def used
Hi,
> If a .def file is used to link a DLL, the --image-base and
> --enable-auto-image-base options are si
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-21 17:41
---
Subject: Re: New: ld 2.13.90 from mingw 3.3.1 cores on malformatted
.def file
Hi,
> when linking a DLL with a .DEF file, if the BASE directive in the .DEF
> file is not of the form "BASE=0x1c
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-02-28 15:39
---
Subject: Re: New: ar (version 050223 20050223) segfaults
at line 4422
Hi Eric,
> GCC 3.4.3 was used to build binutils and the object files below.
> This problem is reproducable in binutils 040922.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-03-15 16:34
---
Hi Laurent,
This is not a bug but rather a feature of gprof. It considers nested
functions to be part of their parent function and by default it will include
their timing in their parent's total. You ca
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-03-17 08:25
---
Hi Fred,
Yup, that is a typo alright. I have checked in your patch.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-03-18 11:38
---
Hi Hans-Peter,
0x80 and 0xc3 are not ASCII characters, so why would you expect GAS to be able
to assemble them if they are not inside a string defintion ?
For what it is worth I was able to compile and
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-03-18 13:06
---
Subject: Re: UCN problems exposed by GCC tests: gcc.dg/ucnid-2.c,
3, 4 and 6.
Hi Hans-Peter,
> In response to comment #1, I would expect GAS to assemble it because it's
> generated by GCC (presu
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-03-29 17:48
---
Subject: Re: New: linking error: cannot handle R_MEM_INDIRECT
reloc when using symbolsrec output
Hi dorchen1611,
> On creating a .lx File for hms-8300 microprocessor (Lego robot) following
> linker
&
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-01 13:27
---
Subject: Re: Addr2line ignores the DWARF DW_AT_ranges attributes
Hi Fred,
> Proposed patch to fix the reported problem
This patch is approved - please apply.
Cheers
Nick
--
h
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-11 15:59
---
Subject: Re: New: Fails to build in 64bit mode
Hi Francois,
> binutils-2.15 does not compile in 64bit mode due to the fact that, starting in
> AIX5.2, in 64bit, we do not support the old format of vm-in
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-11 16:20
---
Subject: Re: New: error handling %farg[0-4] registers
Hi Eric, Hi David,
> When gas encounters the statement:
> fldws -4(%r22),%farg0
> it issues the error:
> Error: Field out of
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-12 08:39
---
Patch applied
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-13 16:13
---
Subject: Re: New: GAS .rept pseudo op-code
Hi Jaydeep,
> Following code generates error,
>
> .rept 2
> .irp m1 1,2
>
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-13 15:40
---
Subject: Re: mips64-elf-readelf was crashed by EABI64 binary.
Hi Monaka,
Do you have a small testcase with which we can reproduce this failure
and test any fixes ?
Cheers
Nick
--
http
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-15 10:49
---
Subject: Re: New: linker issued assertion failure elf64-ppc.c:7771
Hi Robert,
> The problem caught is about error during linking of executable.
> /usr/bin/ld: BFD 041202 20041202 assertion fail elf64-ppc.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-15 11:46
---
Subject: Re: New: Error: Zero-length symbol is illegal
Hi Andreas,
> The ia64 assembler is choking on `.file ""' with the error message
> "Zero-length symbol is illegal". A
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-22 14:52
---
Subject: Re: New: Linker should abort when there is reference
to discarded section
Hi H.J.
> Gcc was broken due to a back checkin:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21070
> Linker did
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 08:07
---
Subject: Re: New: Compilation errors for binutil-2.14 on
RedHat 7.2
Hi Vivekk,
> I am getting to compilation errors for binutils-2.14.
FYI: This is an old release of binutils. We are now at 2.15 and vers
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 14:20
---
Created an attachment (id=464)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=464&action=view)
Initialise obfd field of name_list structure.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 13:07
---
Hi Vivek,
Those environment settings look OK. Since you can build binutils with the
2.15 sources and not the 2.14 source I conclude that the problem must have been
a broken prototype somewhere in the 2.14
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 14:50
---
Patch applied - case closed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 14:26
---
Hi Pawe³,
The seg fault was caused by a silly fault in the name_list handling code
inside the copy_archive() function. The 'obfd' field was not being initialised
to a proper value. The attached p
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-05 14:35
---
Subject: Re: New: bfd leaks memory in several places
Hi John,
> bfd has several memory leaks. I'm fixing the ones in dwarf2.c, but a simple
> grep
> for 'bfd_realloc' shows several
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-05 17:00
---
Hi,
This appears to be a bug in the symbol value evaluation code in gas. It has
special case code for + and - based expressions, but for others it just ignores
any errors unless the value is being finalized
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-05 17:01
---
Created an attachment (id=477)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=477&action=view)
Proposed patch
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=876
--- You are re
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-17 16:01
---
Hi Hollis,
Great. I have now checked this patch in along with this ChangeLog entry.
Cheers
Nick
gas/ChangeLog
2005-05-17 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR 876
* sym
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-17 16:16
---
Subject: Re: Extension to BFD and addr2line to print inlining
chain
Hi Fred,
> Created an attachment (id=487)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=487&action=view)
&g
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-18 08:42
---
Hi Hotti,
This problem is due to the fact that the assembler does not distinguish
between decimal constants and hexadecimal constants. The assembler considers
that the following instruction is correct and
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-06-08 15:46
---
Created an attachment (id=510)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=510&action=view)
Fix seg fault by checking for a NULL pointer
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-06-08 17:04
---
Hi Tom,
Thanks for reporting this problem and submit the patches to fix it. I have
checked them in, with a little tidying up of the formatting and a few comments
added, and I also created this ChangeLog entry
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-06-08 15:45
---
Hi Richard,
Agreed, the assembler should not crash. I am applying the patch in the
attachmrnt to stop the seg fault hapeening.
Cheers
Nick
gas/ChangeLog
2005-06-08 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTEC
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-07-14 15:36
---
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in libiberty/xexit.c:51
Hi Guys,
> Alan wrote:
> No, this is a buffer overflow of gas/config/tc-crx.c:ins_parse in reset_vars.
And I am applying this patch to stop the ov
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-07-14 15:37
---
Patch applied
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-09-30 15:25
---
Subject: Re: New: objcopy trashes PE executable when using
"add-gnu-debuglink"
Hi,
> Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
> 0 .gnu_debuglink 0018 00
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-11 12:34
---
Subject: Re: New: c++filt no longer works with stdin
Hi HJ,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$ cat foo.s
> .type _Z1fv, @function
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$
> /export/build/gnu/binutils-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-11 16:05
---
Subject: Re: objcopy trashes PE executable when using
"add-gnu-debuglink"
Hi,
> currently one can fix this manually by executing additional step:
> objcopy --change-section-vma .gnu_debuglin
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-11 16:34
---
Subject: Re: c++filt no longer works with stdin
Hi HJ,
> It works for me.
I have applied the patch.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1437
--- You are receiving t
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-19 17:06
---
Subject: Re: New: DISASSEMBLER_NEEDS_RELOCS doesn't work
correctly
Hi H.J.
> added DISASSEMBLER_NEEDS_RELOCS based in the enabled targets at configure
> time. It has several problems:
>
> 1.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-28 10:34
---
Subject: Re: New: COFF code section should be read only
Hi Vahur,
> To create object files which are link-compatible with MS Visual C, the "x"
> flag
> in .section directive should also se
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-10-28 10:36
---
Created an attachment (id=730)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=730&action=view)
set readonly bit when handling 'x' attribute for COFF .section pseudo op
--
http
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1568
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-07 17:57
---
Revised patch applied. (Sorry about the silly thinko in the first version).
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-08 15:04
---
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
Hi Michael,
> I ran into this one as well on IRIX-6.5.28m with gcc-4.0.1 and
> binutils-2.16.1.
> Why is this bug in status WAITING? Is more
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-09 16:24
---
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
Hi Michael,
> I don't have any information beyond the error message and what I learned from
> the message to the mailing list quoted above.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-09 16:25
---
Created an attachment (id=752)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=752&action=view)
attempt to ignore OPTIONAL symbols
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-10 11:45
---
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
Hi Michael,
> Okay, I gave it a try to build a testcase. It's included in the attachment.
Thanks. I was not able to run all of the tests in
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-10 12:51
---
Created an attachment (id=754)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=754&action=view)
Second attempt to handle OPTIONAL symbols
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-11 11:21
---
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
Hi Michael,
> The testcase nwo runs fine with the patched ld:
Great - I will check that patch in then as a first step in resolving
this PR.
&
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-11-21 18:30
---
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
Hi Michael,
> using the above test case I tracked down the place in elflink.c where the
> symbol os is reported as undefined when localed in a sha
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-12-22 17:46
---
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
Hi Rainer,
> Did somebody else some tests using these binutils patches?
Not yet, but I am back at my normal workplace now, so this is on my list.
&g
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-12-23 12:28
---
Hi Micha,
Sorry for the long delay in reviewing your latest patch. As it turns out it
is fine (module a few formatting niggles) and so I have checked it in to the
sources along with this ChangeLog entry
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-12-27 11:55
---
Patch approved and applied along with this ChangeLog entry.
gas/ChangeLog
2005-12-27 James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR 1300
* config/tc-arm.c (md_apply_fix): Fix casts to match t
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-12-27 16:34
---
Hi James,
I have synchronized the version in the binutils sources with the version in
the gcc sources, which has the effect of bringing in the change that you have
requested.
Cheers
Nick
--
What
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-16 18:17
---
Hi Brian, Hi Anastasius,
>> Yes, although I am not sure if an easy fix exists. In the meantime
>> please could you try the attached patch which might work. The problem
>> with it is that it
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-16 17:47
---
Created an attachment (id=831)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=831&action=view)
Add missing ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED declarations to elfcore_write_pstatus().
--
http://sourceware.org/b
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-16 18:18
---
Created an attachment (id=832)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=832&action=view)
Create a VMA for the gnu_debuglink section
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-16 17:46
---
Hi Michael,
Removing those two parameters from elfcode_write_pstatus() would mean changing
the BFD library's API, which is not something to be done lightly. For example
it would also mean cha
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-17 10:35
---
Patch commited with this ChangeLog:
bfd/ChangeLog
2006-01-17 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR binutils/2159
* elf.c (elfcore_write_pstatus): Add ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED to unused
para
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-18 10:51
---
Hi Guys,
I have applied the patch, along with Danny's fix to make sure that the VMA is
aligned. The changelog for it is shown below.
Cheers
Nick
binutils/ChangeLog
2006-01-18 Nick Clifton &l
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-26 14:56
---
Subject: Re: objcopy trashes PE executable when using
"add-gnu-debuglink"
Hi Brian,
>> PR binutils/1391
>> * objcopy.c (copy_object): For PE format targets set the VMA of a
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-01-30 11:56
---
This bug was fixed by Jakub Jelinek's patch of 2005-06-14, where amoungst other
changes to readelf.c he includes:
(process_program_headers): Don't crash if string_table is NULL.
With this patc
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-03-01 13:33
---
Hi Alec,
Please could you try the uploaded patch.
The problem is that the binary you have is corrupt. The e_shstrndx field in
the ELF header is wrong. It says that the string table is held in section 8
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-07 14:48
---
Subject: Re: New: incorrect syntax in avr disassembly
Hi hochstein,
> The disassembly for call and jmp looks like this:
>
> 43a: 0e 94 7e 0e call0x1cfc <__divmodhi4>
>
>
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-12 13:11
---
Thank you. I am now able to reproduce the bug and I have approved your patch.
it does not quite perform as you say, since the hexadecimal form of the address
is displayed twice:
0: 0e 94 7e 0e
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-13 09:15
---
Hi Mack,
This is not a bug, but a feature. The AVR assembler has chosen to use a reloc
with the JMP instruction, so the actual address is not resolved until link time.
If you disassemble the object file with
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 16:04
---
Subject: Re: New: dwarf2dbg.c embeds absolute filename path
with hard-coded / separator
Hi Burgess,
> dwarf2dbg.c -- line 1476 of CVS version 1.81:
>
> p[len] = '/';
>
> This inser
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 16:06
---
Created an attachment (id=981)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=981&action=view)
Intelligent selection of path separator for DOS
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2582
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 16:22
---
Subject: Re: New: Failed to build gprof under gmake patched
by Apple.
Hi Masaki,
> Building gprof was failed because of patched gmake (bundled with OSX).
> Follow is a patch to disable a builtin
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 16:23
---
Patch applied
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-04-26 10:22
---
Subject: Re: dwarf2dbg.c embeds absolute filename path with
hard-coded / separator
Hi Bill,
> Another thought -- why not look for the THIRD character to be a backslash?
> This will handle no
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-05 16:54
---
Subject: Re: dwarf2dbg.c embeds absolute filename path with
hard-coded / separator
Hi Bill,
> My dev system is back up but I find I am too much of a noob to build the
> binutils so I can test the
&
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-05 16:56
---
Patch checked in.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-05 17:15
---
Subject: Re: linker doesn't recognize an ELF library.
Hi Pawel,
> strip also can't handle this precompiled external library.
>
> $ sparc-sun-solaris2.9-strip -g libcmodel.so --verbose
>
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-05 17:34
---
Subject: Re: New: iwmmxt instructions range error
Hi Bridge,
> % arm-iwmmxt-linux-gnueabi-as -mcpu=iwmmxt iwmmxt-range.s
> iwmmxt-range.s: Assembler messages:
> iwmmxt-range.s:5: Error: co-processor o
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-08 16:40
---
Subject: Re: linker doesn't recognize an ELF library.
Hi Pawel,
> I don't know. It's a commercial closed source library
> which works perfectly with native solaris linker/stripper
> a
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-08 17:07
---
Hi Corentin,
Sorry - the colon character (:) is used - by the macro code. See the file
gas/testsuite/gas/macros/vararg.s for an example of this, and an example of a
test that would fail if we applied the patch
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-10 12:23
---
Subject: Re: linker doesn't recognize an ELF library.
Hi Pawel,
> I will attach the three different shared objects, in the event that some
> maintainer has access to an appropriate Solaris/Sparc sys
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-10 12:24
---
Created an attachment (id=1016)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1016&action=view)
Fix determination of valid section indicies
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2607
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-11 09:04
---
Subject: Re: linker doesn't recognize an ELF library.
Hi Pawel,
> pluto at agmk dot net wrote:
> works for me :)
Excellent - I have applied the patch to the mainline and the 2.17 branch
as we
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-24 08:39
---
Created an attachment (id=1047)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1047&action=view)
Add check for missing aux entries
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2659
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-24 08:40
---
Hi Anton,
I think that this is a case of a missing check in bfd_coff_link_input_bfd, so
please could you try the uploaded patch and let me know if it works on a real
world test, (ie your build environment
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-08 10:16
---
Hi,
Please could you provide us with the files necessary to reproduce this bug ?
(ie: main.o, crt0.o etc and the libraries). Also, please could you run gcc with
the -v switch and tell us the precise command
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-09 13:36
---
Hi Asher,
The problem appears to be that the .tcommon section has an alignment of 1
whereas the "matrix" symbol has an alignment of 4.
The code to generate the warning message was not taking into a
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-09 13:37
---
Created an attachment (id=1069)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1069&action=view)
Handle case where common alignment is deduced from section alginment and not
another common de
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-12 11:18
---
Patch applied.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-14 16:36
---
Hi Stephane,
Can you provide an example object file containing debug information for a
segmented address architecture ?
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-22 14:03
---
Subject: Re: New: Strange profiling results
Hi Dmitry,
> void f (int n)
> {
> rdtscll (t);
> void g (int n)
> {
> gettimeofday (&tv, 0);
> int main (int argc, cha
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2776
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-22 14:36
---
Hi Stephane,
Thanks for supplying the test cases. I have now been able to reproduce the
problem and I am going to upload a patch that fixes it. If you would care to
try it out and let me know if you encounter
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-06-22 14:38
---
Created an attachment (id=)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=&action=view)
Compute address size as sum of pointer size and segment size
--
http://sourceware.org/b
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2768
--- You are receiving this mail because:
1 - 100 of 4138 matches
Mail list logo
