------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2005-04-25 14:26 
-------
Hi  Paweł,

  The seg fault was caused by a silly fault in the name_list handling code
inside the copy_archive() function.  The 'obfd' field was not being initialised
to a proper value.  The attached patch fixes this problem and allows your test
case to run, although it still generates the "Invalid operation" message.

Do you have any problems with this patch or shall I close this PR ?

Cheers
  Nick

binutils/ChangeLog
2005-04-25  Nick Clifton  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR872
        * objcopy.c (copy_archive): Initialise 'obfd' field of new
        name_list structure.
        


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to