------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 14:26 ------- Hi Paweł,
The seg fault was caused by a silly fault in the name_list handling code inside the copy_archive() function. The 'obfd' field was not being initialised to a proper value. The attached patch fixes this problem and allows your test case to run, although it still generates the "Invalid operation" message. Do you have any problems with this patch or shall I close this PR ? Cheers Nick binutils/ChangeLog 2005-04-25 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR872 * objcopy.c (copy_archive): Initialise 'obfd' field of new name_list structure. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils