[Bug gas/4572] division doesn't work on solaris/x86

2009-08-02 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-03 01:19 --- Gas is mainly for gcc. Assembler from Sun may not support the new x86 instructions, like SSE4, AVX, You may have to use gas with gcc. It isn't a good idea to make gas different from the n

[Bug binutils/10364] strip doesn't fail on unwriteable files

2009-08-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-03 13:48 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools

[Bug binutils/10363] objdump -T crashes on corrupted file

2009-08-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-03 14:02 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00022.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly

2009-08-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-03 15:53 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/10363] objdump -T crashes on corrupted file

2009-08-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-04 01:07 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/4572] division doesn't work on solaris/x86

2009-08-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-04 22:57 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00048.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4572 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug gas/10531] New: Strange assembler warning message on section group

2009-08-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
t: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au,bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10531 --- You are re

[Bug gas/10531] Strange assembler warning message on section group

2009-08-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-17 23:08 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00293.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10531 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug gas/10534] New: Windows cross binutils is broken

2009-08-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: Windows cross binutils is broken Product: binutils Version: 2.20 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot

[Bug ld/10536] New: Incorrect install-pdf/install-html

2009-08-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Product: binutils Version: 2.20 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at g

[Bug gas/10534] Windows cross binutils is broken

2009-08-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-19 03:11 --- The current patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00334.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10534 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug gas/10534] Windows cross binutils is broken

2009-08-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-19 03:13 --- Oops. Fixed by: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00316.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/10531] Strange assembler warning message on section group

2009-08-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-19 03:14 --- The current patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00334.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10531 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug ld/10536] Incorrect install-pdf/install-html

2009-08-23 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 19:44 --- Fixed by: http://sourceware.org/ml/src-cvs/2009-q3/msg00025.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/10531] Strange assembler warning message on section group

2009-08-24 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-24 13:59 --- The current patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00405.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10531 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug binutils/10546] /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 20061020 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/bfd.c line 506 in _bfd_default_error_handler

2009-08-25 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 19:32 --- Closed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/10569] -z max-page-size may not work for linker scripts

2009-08-27 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-28 00:03 --- Here is a patch with 2 testcases: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00512.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10569 --- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug ld/10569] New: -z max-page-size may not work for linker scripts

2009-08-27 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Version: 2.20 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gas/10570] [regression] test suite regressions on mips{, el}-linux-gnu

2009-08-31 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-31 18:49 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/10630] New: Linker generates hidden local symbols

2009-09-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug ld/10630] Linker generates hidden local symbols

2009-09-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-11 19:57 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-09/msg00339.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10630 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug gas/10636] New: x86-64 assembler misassemble 32bit absolute address

2009-09-12 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bu

[Bug gas/10637] New: x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode

2009-09-12 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
l mode Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at g

[Bug gas/10637] x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode

2009-09-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 21:39 --- A patch is posted at https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#all/123ba7dce13b902f -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug gas/10637] x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode

2009-09-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 21:49 --- This is a regression. The older assembler does: [...@gnu-33 memory-6]$ cat y.s .text .intel_syntax noprefix mov ebx, [0xEE000F0] mov dword ptr [0xEE000F0], ebx [...@gnu

[Bug gas/10636] x86-64 assembler misassemble 32bit absolute address

2009-09-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 22:06 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/10637] x86 assembler failed to handle [addr] in Intel mode

2009-09-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-15 13:41 --- Binutils 2.15 gives no warnings at all and treats [] as memory. We shouldn't change the meaning of [] unless there is a very strong reason to do so. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug ld/10681] New: [Regression] FAIL: ld-elf/eh6

2009-09-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils a

[Bug ld/10681] [Regression] FAIL: ld-elf/eh6

2009-09-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-21 16:15 --- It is caused by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2009-09/msg00238.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/10681] [Regression] FAIL: ld-elf/eh6

2009-09-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-21 16:25 --- It also failed on Linux/ia32: regexp_diff match failure regexp "^ Augmentation data: 80 .* 1b$" line " Augmentation data: 90 1a 10 00 00 1b" FAIL: ld-elf/eh6 -- h

[Bug ld/10681] [Regression] FAIL: ld-elf/eh6

2009-09-22 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-22 16:12 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/10677] incorrect code generated with asm function pointers when compiled with -fPIC on x84_64

2009-09-23 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-23 22:54 --- Even if I changed assembler to emit R_X86_64_GOTPCREL for local symbol, linker still won't generate local dynamic relocation for it. I don't feel to make assembler and linker changes. I may

[Bug gas/10677] incorrect code generated with asm function pointers when compiled with -fPIC on x84_64

2009-09-23 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot ||com http://sourceware.org

[Bug gas/10677] incorrect code generated with asm function pointers when compiled with -fPIC on x84_64

2009-09-24 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 14:39 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/10630] Linker generates hidden local symbols

2009-09-24 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 16:03 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/10704] as segfault in memory lookup intel syntax

2009-09-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 19:02 --- A patch is posted at https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#all/1240c54aec8501cc -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/10704] as segfault in memory lookup intel syntax

2009-09-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 19:13 --- Oops. The patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-09/msg00742.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10704 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug gas/10733] New: No testcases for new .cfi_sections directive

2009-10-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bug

[Bug gas/2117] IA64 assembler is broken

2009-10-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-05 23:27 --- Reopened since the patch is reverted. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/10744] New: Linker failed to build ia64 kernel

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10744 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/10744] Linker failed to build ia64 kernel

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-07 18:18 --- Created an attachment (id=4260) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4260&action=view) A testcase for Linux/ia64 Working linker: [...@gnu-14 kernel]$ ld -o gate-syms.o -T g

[Bug ld/10744] Linker failed to build ia64 kernel

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-07 18:22 --- It is caused by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2009-10/msg00056.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10744 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug gas/10740] amd64+i386 as: i8086 Intel syntax far jumps broken (both variants of them)

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-07 19:42 --- I have a hard time to understand what the problem is. Please provide 1. Assembly source. 2. Command line options. 3. Expected output. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/10740] amd64+i386 as: i8086 Intel syntax far jumps broken (both variants of them)

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot ||com http://sourceware.org

[Bug binutils/10704] as segfault in memory lookup intel syntax

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-07 20:03 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ld/10744] Linker failed to build ia64 kernel

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-07 22:45 --- The reasons ia64 kernel does are 1. EPC segment has to be marked PF_X without PF_R. 2. We can only have one PT_LOAD segment in vDSO. ia64 kernel uses PHDRS { readable PT_LOAD FILEHDR PHDRS FLAGS(4

[Bug ld/10744] Linker failed to build ia64 kernel

2009-10-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-08 00:51 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-10/msg00182.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10744 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug ld/10749] New: Failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

[Bug ld/10749] Failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-08 19:54 --- Binutils 20090831 is OK. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-08 22:33 --- 20090923 linker is OK and 20090929 linker is bad. Alan, I think your "ld -r" patch may be the cause. -- What|Removed

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 03:08 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Do you have a good and a bad kernel image for me to look at? Please get ftp://ftp.intel.com/pub/incoming/ia64.tar.bz2 It will disappear in a few hours. Thanks. -- h

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 03:57 --- Please get http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4260&action=view and do [...@gnu-14 kernel]$ ld -r -o gate-syms.o -T gate.lds gate.o 20090929 linker generates bad gate-syms.o. --

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 04:09 --- This patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-09/msg00365.html may be the cause. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 15:41 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 16:31 --- (In reply to comment #13) > On hppa-unknown-linux-gnu: > > Executing on host: sh -c > {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../binutils/readelf > -S --wide tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.o

[Bug gas/10740] amd64+i386 as: i8086 Intel syntax far jumps broken (both variants of them)

2009-10-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 21:35 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > 1. Assembly source. > > .intel_syntax noprefix > .text > .code16 > .globl _start > _start: ljmp0xF000,0xFFF0 >

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-11 02:03 --- (In reply to comment #17) > Exactly. The reason is that .text is made a unique section, so doesn't match > the .text in the script. See unique_section_p, in particular the one in > output_se

[Bug gas/10740] amd64+i386 as: i8086 Intel syntax far jumps broken (both variants of them)

2009-10-12 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-12 23:18 --- Created an attachment (id=4275) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4275&action=view) A patch -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10740 --- You are receivi

[Bug gas/10740] Intel syntax far jumps broken

2009-10-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|amd64+i386 as: i8086 Intel |Intel syntax far jumps |syntax far jumps broken |broken |(both variant

[Bug gas/10740] Intel syntax far jumps broken

2009-10-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-13 16:23 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug admin/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-13 16:26 --- The proposed solution isn't acceptable since vex_table is very dynamic. -- What|Removed |

[Bug admin/10763] variable defined inside code in elf32-i386.c

2009-10-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-13 16:38 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/10766] Variable defined inside code in gas/config/tc-i386.c

2009-10-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-13 16:45 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug admin/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-14 14:56 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Oh, it was not meant as a fix. Just as an information. You can try enum. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10767 --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug admin/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #4285|application/octet-stream|application/text mime type|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug admin/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #4285|application/text|text/plain mime type|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10

[Bug admin/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-15 21:32 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=4285) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4285&action=view) > Nice. Jerker, please give it a try. -- http://s

[Bug gas/10636] x86-64 assembler misassemble 32bit absolute address

2009-10-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 13:35 --- (In reply to comment #3) > so i guess it's expected that openssl will no longer assemble with this > change ? > > 41:leal3614090360(%rax,%r10,1),%eax > 50:leal39054027

[Bug gas/10636] x86-64 assembler misassemble 32bit absolute address

2009-10-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 15:36 --- (In reply to comment #5) > thanks, just wanted to make sure the issue was with the assembly code > > i'm not terribly great with x86 assembly. could you suggest a fix ? every > statemen

[Bug gas/10775] x86 64 documentation addenda

2009-10-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 16:30 --- (In reply to comment #0) > The following information is lacking from the GAS manual: > > In node (as.info)i386-Mnemonics, add at the end of 9.13.4, > > In 64-bit mode, `movabs' is

[Bug gas/10636] x86-64 assembler misassemble 32bit absolute address

2009-10-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 16:39 --- (In reply to comment #7) > i'm pretty sure they should all be unsigned How does code work since hardware treats them as signed for calculation? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug gas/10775] x86 64 documentation addenda

2009-10-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 16:55 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/10767] opcodes/i386-dis.c exceeds 256 levels of nested macros

2009-10-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 17:57 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/10775] x86 64 documentation addenda

2009-10-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-19 17:08 --- (In reply to comment #4) > > > > movabs is not the only form to load a 64-bit literal into a register. > > If there are other forms, where are they documented? The normal "mov&q

[Bug binutils/10802] objcopy an executable file compiled with PIE failed

2009-10-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot ||com Version|unspecified

[Bug binutils/10802] objcopy an executable file compiled with PIE failed

2009-10-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-19 18:33 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-10/msg00396.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10802 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug gold/10893] New: gold doesn't work with multi-arched libc.a

2009-11-02 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Summary: gold doesn't work with multi-arched libc.a Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot co

[Bug gold/10895] New: "make install-pdf" doesn't work

2009-11-02 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
duct: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bu

[Bug gold/10893] gold doesn't work with multi-arched libc.a

2009-11-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-03 17:41 --- Gold generates those symbols. However, those special sections +".rel.iplt", // output_section +".rela.iplt", // output_section are generated

[Bug gold/10899] New: gold test failures with gcc 4.1

2009-11-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
cc 4.1 Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot or

[Bug gold/10893] gold doesn't work with multi-arched libc.a

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 14:45 --- (In reply to comment #5) > gold does not generate the .rel.iplt or .rela.iplt sections itself. I'm not > sure what this has to do with "multi-arched libc.a". gold does not yet >

[Bug gas/10903] New: .fill regression

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10903 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on t

[Bug gas/10903] .fill regression

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 18:19 --- It is caused by symbols.c change in http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-05/msg00163.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/10903] .fill regression

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 18:20 --- The symbols.c patch is for PR 876. -- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO

[Bug gas/876] .space with non-absolute value

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||10903 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=876 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug gas/876] .space with non-absolute value

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 18:21 --- The fix caused PR 10903 and we don't have a testcase for this PR. -- What|Removed |

[Bug gas/10903] .fill regression

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 19:25 --- The code is wrong. It should be rewritten as .text .org 0xf00 org: .byte 8 _end: .fill 4096 - (_end - org + 0xf00) _foo

[Bug gas/876] .space with non-absolute value

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- Bug 876 depends on bug 10903, which changed state. Bug 10903 Summary: .fill regression http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10903 What|Old Value |New Value St

[Bug gold/10899] gold test failures with gcc 4.1

2009-11-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 19:40 --- I was using gcc 4.1 with run-time library from gcc 3.4. Run-time library from gcc 4.1 is OK. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gold/10910] gold is broken

2009-11-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-05 19:09 --- .note.ABI-tag .note.gnu.build-id sections are put in PT_LOAD segment twice. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10910 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug gold/10910] gold is broken

2009-11-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-05 19:23 --- The bug is in do_sort in Output_segment::add_output_section(). It adds a note section without removing the old one. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10910 --- You are receiving

[Bug gold/10910] gold is broken

2009-11-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-05 18:43 --- Both .note.ABI-tag .note.gnu.build-id sections can appear in 2 segments: Section to Segment mapping: Segment Sections... 00 01 .interp 02 .interp .note.ABI-tag .note.gnu.build-id

[Bug gold/10910] gold is broken

2009-11-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-05 19:59 --- http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/output.cc.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.103&r2=1.104 doesn't match the ChangeLog entry. Is @@ -3558,9 +3554,11 @@ off += (*p)->a

[Bug ld/10911] ld -s -static breaks IRELATIVE relocations

2009-11-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-08 23:03 --- This patch should work: diff --git a/bfd/elflink.c b/bfd/elflink.c index cd016b7..0153411 100644 --- a/bfd/elflink.c +++ b/bfd/elflink.c @@ -8639,9 +8639,11 @@ elf_link_output_extsym (struct

[Bug ld/10911] ld -s -static breaks IRELATIVE relocations

2009-11-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-09 00:33 --- A patch is posted at: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-11/msg00146.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10911 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on

[Bug gold/10925] New: Gold failed to build on Linux/x86-64

2009-11-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
d returned 1 exit status make[6]: *** [ld-new] Error 1 -- Summary: Gold failed to build on Linux/x86-64 Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot

[Bug ld/10911] ld -s -static breaks IRELATIVE relocations

2009-11-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-09 14:56 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gold/10930] New: plugin tests don't work

2009-11-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
tatus: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10930 --- Yo

[Bug gold/10930] plugin tests don't work

2009-11-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-09 15:55 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-11/msg00162.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10930 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug ld/10933] New: libbfd and libopcodes don't support multilib

2009-11-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
ormal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10933 --- You are receiving this mail be

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >