On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:29:28PM +0800, Zhengxiong Luo wrote:
> Dear Binutils Maintainer,
>
> I'm reporting two undefined behavior issues found in binutils-2.43's cxxfilt.
The demangler is part of the gcc project. Bugs in the demangler
should be reported to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Pleas
Dear Binutils Maintainer,
I'm reporting two undefined behavior issues found in binutils-2.43's cxxfilt.
# Build
```shell
wget https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.43.tar.gz
tar -xzf binutils-2.43.tar.gz
rm binutils-2.43.tar.gz
cd binutils-2.43
CC=clang CXX=clang++ CFLAGS="-g -fsanitize=ad
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29495
Bug ID: 29495
Summary: Bug report
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29492
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29492
--- Comment #2 from Shuang Po ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> The endless looping is all in the rust demangler. Please report these bugs
> to the gcc project at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
>
> It is helpful to report the sym
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29491
--- Comment #2 from Shuang Po ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> Fixed with commit ef186fe54aa
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29492
Bug ID: 29492
Summary: program nm-new bug report
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29491
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29491
Bug ID: 29491
Summary: program strip-new bug report
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Any update on this..?
On Fri 6 Dec, 2019, 12:16 PM kunal mhaske, wrote:
> Yes, I did.
>
> On Fri 6 Dec, 2019, 12:12 PM Ian Lance Taylor, wrote:
>
>> kunal mhaske writes:
>>
>> > Because the github leak the your engineers id and password
>>
>> You seem to be confusing binut...@sourceware.org wi
Yes, I did.
On Fri 6 Dec, 2019, 12:12 PM Ian Lance Taylor, wrote:
> kunal mhaske writes:
>
> > Because the github leak the your engineers id and password
>
> You seem to be confusing binut...@sourceware.org with a Red Hat mailing
> list.
>
> Ian
>
> > On Thu 5 Dec, 2019, 9:41 PM Ian Lance Taylo
kunal mhaske writes:
> Because the github leak the your engineers id and password
You seem to be confusing binut...@sourceware.org with a Red Hat mailing
list.
Ian
> On Thu 5 Dec, 2019, 9:41 PM Ian Lance Taylor, wrote:
>
>> kunal mhaske writes:
>>
>> > Any update on this?
>>
>> I don't under
Any Attacker get that engineer credentials through github..
On Fri 6 Dec, 2019, 7:47 AM kunal mhaske, wrote:
> This is very harmfull..fix this ..
>
> On Fri 6 Dec, 2019, 7:47 AM kunal mhaske,
> wrote:
>
>> Because the github leak the your engineers id and password
>>
>> On Thu 5 Dec, 2019, 9:41
Because the github leak the your engineers id and password
On Thu 5 Dec, 2019, 9:41 PM Ian Lance Taylor, wrote:
> kunal mhaske writes:
>
> > Any update on this?
>
> I don't understand why you are reporting this to bug-binutils@gnu.org.
>
> Ian
>
This is very harmfull..fix this ..
On Fri 6 Dec, 2019, 7:47 AM kunal mhaske, wrote:
> Because the github leak the your engineers id and password
>
> On Thu 5 Dec, 2019, 9:41 PM Ian Lance Taylor, wrote:
>
>> kunal mhaske writes:
>>
>> > Any update on this?
>>
>> I don't understand why you are r
kunal mhaske writes:
> Any update on this?
I don't understand why you are reporting this to bug-binutils@gnu.org.
Ian
Any update on this?
On Sun 1 Dec, 2019, 10:15 PM kunal mhaske, wrote:
> Any update on this?
>
> On Sun 17 Nov, 2019, 5:49 PM kunal mhaske,
> wrote:
>
>> Title: Leaking sensitive information on Github (Database connection
>> And username, password)
>>
>> Vulnerability Name: Information Leak - G
Any update on this?
On Sun 17 Nov, 2019, 5:49 PM kunal mhaske, wrote:
> Title: Leaking sensitive information on Github (Database connection
> And username, password)
>
> Vulnerability Name: Information Leak - Github
>
> Target: https://www.redhat.com/
>
> Summary:
> Accidental leakage of secret
Hello, I found a bug in objdump and in gdb(It seems that you work together)
with the i386 disassembler. The bug is that instructions print with the rm mod,
mod = 0, rm = 5(0b101), in 32-Bit Addressing forms is false.(the example with
the photo)
I tried to patch it and i found where the bug is.
Hi nick,
Thanks for the information. I just filed the heap overflow bug report.
Please find it at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942.
Thank you
Dongdong
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:58 AM Nick Clifton wrote:
> HI Dongdong,
>
> > We are doing some fuzzing tests
HI Dongdong,
> We are doing some fuzzing tests on Binutils-2.30
Just as an aside the latest binutils release is 2.31.1 ...
> and find a heap overflow bug in nm-new 32 bit version.
Was there a binutils bug report filed for this problem ? I may have missed it.
> We also filed a
Thx a lot for your feedback. From the answer of H. J. Lu it seems this is
not a bug but a feature. Knowing about this I was able to find some post in
stackoverflow.com where this "problem" is already mentioned. I have to say
it is really confusing!
Thx a lot again. Have a nice day.
Sébastien
Le
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:48:06AM +0200, Sébastien Dusuel wrote:
> I seem to have found a bug in GNU as, when using the intel syntax on x86_64,
Indeed you have. I have opened
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21373
to track this issue.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
Hello,
I seem to have found a bug in GNU as, when using the intel syntax on x86_64,
for some mov instructions, as explained below. I looked into the archive,
and could not find a mention of this bug. You'll find two source files
attached.
Best regards,
Sébastien Dusuel
--
Hi Piotr,
> /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.22
2.22 is quite an old release. Please could you try the latest release (2.26)
and
see if the problem persists.
If the problem is still there, please could you file a bug report here:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Includin
Welcome,
Today i wanted to compile https://github.com/dcid/rootcheck/, but i can't
because "/usr/bin/ld" have error during copilation.
I have Debian wheezy
md5 sum of /usr/bin/ld: 9d191aa4c02fddb867fe303a622175af
error log:
Making monitord
cc -g -Wall -I../ -I../headers -DDEFAULTDIR=\"/tmp/rootch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16952
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16952
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16952
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16952
Bug ID: 16952
Summary: PowerPC LD requests bug report. Issue related to EABI
symbols _SDA_BASE_, _SDA2_BASE_
Product: binutils
Version: 2.25 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16130
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16130
Bug ID: 16130
Summary: Checkin no longer shows up in bug report
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:46:23PM +, David Binderman wrote:
> [binutils-2.21.53.0.2/gas/config/tc-mn10200.c:483]: (warning) Redundant
> assignment of "opcode" in switch
>
> The source code is
>
> case 0xff:
> opcode = 0xfe;
> case 0xe8:
>
> There looks to be a missing break i
Hello there,
I just ran the static analysis tool cppcheck over the source
code of binutils-2.21.53.0.2. It said
1.
[binutils-2.21.53.0.2/gas/config/tc-mn10200.c:483]: (warning) Redundant
assignment of "opcode" in switch
The source code is
case 0xff:
opcode = 0xfe;
case 0xe8:
S Akhtar writes:
> 9. A description of error encountered:
>
> *Unhex: unknown Intel-hex record type: 0x04*
>
> *Unhex: line ‘:02040010EA’::*
>
> *From file ‘hello.hex’; Unrecognized record type*
> A snapshot of the received error is attached for reference.
> *Note: Pleas
Hi Bin,
I encountered a bug in the newest version of binutils.
4. The error message:
../../src/gold/plugin.cc: 618:13: error: variable 'sym_size' set but not
used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
That is strange, since sym_size is used on the very next line:
unsigned char symbuf[sym_size];
Hi,
I encountered a bug in the newest version of binutils.
1. I checked out the fresh source code from the cvs repository by
cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anon...@sourceware.org:/cvs/src co binutils
So the binutils must be the newest version.
2. The installation was configured with
../src/configure
I'm not a regular mail-list member but your page:
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/ says we can email
bug-binutils@gnu.org with bug reports.
I'm running OpenSolaris b94 (which configure identifies as
i386-pc-solaris2.11) and running "make check" produces two errors:
=== gas tests ===
.
Hi Zídek,
I apologise for taking so long to getting around to replying to your bug
report. I did try to reproduce the problem, using the current mainline
sources, but I could not get the linker to generate an internal error. I think
that this bug must have been fixed in the recent past
mit a bug report for us
to investigate. There is a bugzilla system set up at:
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/
Or you could email a report to this list. (Please do try to include as
much helpful information as possible, and if at all practical a *small*
testcase that reproduces the pr
Hi,
I may not yet be subscribed, so please CC me.
I have received this bug using GNAT GDB 3.15p. Is there anything I can
do to get more information on what's failing? (ie environment variable)
BFD: BFD internal error, aborting at coffcode.h line 749 in styp_to_sec_flags
BFD: Please report this
41 matches
Mail list logo
