https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #17 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=da36679b3240a7ffe9497ed63f3f522823b65d52
commit da36679b3240a7ffe9497ed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton ---
OK, I am baffled. The missing text seems to have nothing to do with
function-like invocations either inside or outside here blocks. Could there be
two ksh bugs ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth ---
> --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton ---
> Created attachment 15903
> --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15903&action=edit
> Another proposed patch
Hi Nick,
sorry for the delay: I was
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 15903
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15903&action=edit
Another proposed patch
Hi Rainer,
Please could you try out this alternative patch and let
me know if
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #12)
> But the others are apparently not triggering the ksh bug.
How strange. But if not ending a here block with a function-like invocation is
the solution then
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab ---
But the others are apparently not triggering the ksh bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #10)
> But of course, if it is at the end of the here doc anyway, it could also be
> moved out and called as a regular command after it.
True - but there are other
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab ---
But of course, if it is at the end of the here doc anyway, it could also be
moved out and called as a regular command after it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
Because this is part of a here doc where func would be just a literal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Why are we using "$(func)" rather than just plain "func"? Maybe that tickles a
ksh bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Sam James
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3f1585d9c8e809cbdfc725583f361d51f2d50744
commit 3f1585d9c8e809cbdfc725583f3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=616e6c7fe6ba3a7661d852757f59223416a3
commit 616e6c7fe6ba3a7661d852757f59223416a3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
--
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I see one other issue so far (== is not POSIX):
```
--- a/ld/scripttempl/elf.sc
+++ b/ld/scripttempl/elf.sc
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ emit_large_bss()
return
fi
- if test "$1" == "0"; then
+ if test "$1"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
>
> Hmm, there seems to be some inconsistency here. If
> $(align_to_default_symbol_alignment) does not work inside a cat < block then why do $(align_to_default_section_alignment) or $(emit_large_bss
> 0) o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clif
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 15894
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15894&action=edit
proposed patch (hack?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
> I'm still trying to figure out what exactly caused this. So far I've found
> that the the problem started with
>
> commit fe217087a4b8aa214a221ca9f033c5fcdbcee90e
> Author: Nick Clifton
> Date: Wed Nov
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.44
--
You are receiving this mail be
20 matches
Mail list logo
