[Bug ld/32297] sframe: bfd assertion with empty main on IBT enabled system

2025-03-08 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32297 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/32297] sframe: bfd assertion with empty main on IBT enabled system

2025-03-07 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32297 --- Comment #3 from Indu Bhagat --- Fixed in 2.44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32297] sframe: bfd assertion with empty main on IBT enabled system

2024-11-02 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32297 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=1785837a25709721358dab9ee16bbfee74f5f4d1 Fri, 1 Nov 2024 22:26:13 + (15:26 -0700) commit 1785837a25709721358dab9ee16bbfee74f5f4d1 ld: fix PR/3

[Bug ld/32297] sframe: bfd assertion with empty main on IBT enabled system

2024-10-21 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32297 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |indu.bhagat at oracle dot com -

[Bug ld/32297] sframe: bfd assertion with empty main on IBT enabled system

2024-10-21 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32297 --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat --- A hand-crafted reproducer: $ cat bar.c void foo(); unsigned long var; void test () { var = (unsigned long)foo; foo (); } $ cat foo.s .globl foo foo: .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits $ gc