https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson ---
The glibc configure script has been fixed so that it no longer tries to use
ifunc on targets that don't support it.
We still need to add ifunc support to the binutils RISC-V port though.
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #8 from Aurelien Jarno ---
I have opened a bug on the GNU libc side:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25506
And posted the corresponding patch:
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2020-02/msg00084.html
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno ---
It creates a relocation because my GCC defaults to -pie. It is not present when
I compile conftest.S with -no-pie.
I observe the same behaviour with MIPS, which doesn't support IFUNC. It looks
like the G
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Then you need to find out why the assembler creates a relocation. That is
wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #5 from Aurelien Jarno ---
It does succeed here (glibc 2.30, binutils 2.34, gcc 9.2.1):
configure:4009: checking for assembler and linker STT_GNU_IFUNC support
Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x268 contains 1 entry:
Of
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
The test should not succeed, as there are no relocations reported by readelf:
configure:3992: checking for assembler and linker STT_GNU_IFUNC support
There are no relocations in this file.
configure:402
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Thanks for the fast answer. I understand that the support is missing, and that
it might take time to add it.
The problem is not directly the missing support, but the fact that basic
support is there, whi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501
--- Comment #1 from Aurelien Jarno ---
Note that this is on Debian where GCC default to PIE. You might have to pass
-fPIE to be able to reproduce the issue (it is not reproducible with -fno-PIE).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
10 matches
Mail list logo