https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29737
--- Comment #9 from Guillermo E. Martinez ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8)
Hello Nick,
> Sorry - I do not think that this is going to happen.
>
OK. I see, but I made a really big mistake because my original perception was
tha
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202
--- Comment #16 from Olof Kindgren ---
>> I believe that practically no one has actually used this feature much
>> because of this bug
>
>I weakly remember that someone from the RISC-V community community hacked
>their own C program to conve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202
--- Comment #15 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Gökçe Aydos from comment #14)
>> I.e. compiling an asm program that starts with .org 0x100, will that cause
>> the address to be set to @40 when using verilog-data-width=4 ?
>
> Oh, I think
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761
--- Comment #6 from Stas Sergeev ---
Yeah that code looks strange, and if
I had to guess (w/o ever looking into
the actual code), I'd say that just
this is enough:
if (name == NULL || *name == '\0')
disable_output_symbol_name();
as i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29737
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
The questionable code is old, commit 98790d3a95fc. Quite possibly it is no
longer needed. If I assemble and link
.section .data.dropme,"ae",%progbits
foo:
.globl bar
bar:
then both symbols are dropped p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29764
Bug ID: 29764
Summary: objdump confused with --enable-targets=all if several
machines include the same cpu name
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202
--- Comment #14 from Gökçe Aydos ---
(In reply to Olof Kindgren from comment #13)
> ... we are dealing with word addresses, but are we taking that into
> consideration when we're calculating the base address?
>
> I.e. compiling an asm program
