https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29737
--- Comment #9 from Guillermo E. Martinez <guillermo.e.martinez at oracle dot com> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8) Hello Nick, > Sorry - I do not think that this is going to happen. > OK. I see, but I made a really big mistake because my original perception was that eu-strip removes .ctf section, but it doesn't, because it doesn't have a "debug" section name. > Using section flags has been vetoed because there are too many different > ways to strip a binary, and not enough flags to encompass them all. > Even though, if we want remove by default a section, it should be specially named (`dwarf_scn_names'). > Using extended section types might help, but even then you need to persuade > the maintainers of all the different strip tools to agree on which section > types map to which stripping modes. Plus when new section types are added > you have to go through the whole process again. > > All of the strip tools do provide mechanisms for explicitly specifying which > sections should be removed, so for now that will have to do. OK, good. Thanks, and sorry for my misunderstanding. guillermo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.