[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 --- Comment #8 from Aurelien Jarno --- I have opened a bug on the GNU libc side: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25506 And posted the corresponding patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2020-02/msg00084.html -- You a

[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 --- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno --- It creates a relocation because my GCC defaults to -pie. It is not present when I compile conftest.S with -no-pie. I observe the same behaviour with MIPS, which doesn't support IFUNC. It looks like the G

[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- Then you need to find out why the assembler creates a relocation. That is wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 --- Comment #5 from Aurelien Jarno --- It does succeed here (glibc 2.30, binutils 2.34, gcc 9.2.1): configure:4009: checking for assembler and linker STT_GNU_IFUNC support Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x268 contains 1 entry: Of

[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- The test should not succeed, as there are no relocations reported by readelf: configure:3992: checking for assembler and linker STT_GNU_IFUNC support There are no relocations in this file. configure:402

[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 --- Comment #3 from Aurelien Jarno --- Thanks for the fast answer. I understand that the support is missing, and that it might take time to add it. The problem is not directly the missing support, but the fact that basic support is there, whi

[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug gas/25381] Support section flag 'o' (SHF_LINK_ORDER)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #4) > > > .section __patchable_function_entries,"awo",@progbits,foo > > > .section __patchable_function_entries,"awo",@p

Issue 19771 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc

Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 19771 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19771#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly

Issue 19770 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc

Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 19770 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19770#c3 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly

[Bug gas/25380] Support section linkage 'unique' (multiple sections with the same name)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25380 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25381] Support section flag 'o' (SHF_LINK_ORDER)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381 Bug 25381 depends on bug 25380, which changed state. Bug 25380 Summary: Support section linkage 'unique' (multiple sections with the same name) https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25380 What|Removed

Important request, participation in software development study

Dear Engineers, When I write this message, I think I am writing to the best software developers in the world, or to those who are in the process of being one. I write to ask you a favor. I am a UMA PhD student and I study the use of formal and non-formal models in the software industry. Accord

[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12249|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/25501] STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 --- Comment #1 from Aurelien Jarno --- Note that this is on Debian where GCC default to PIE. You might have to pass -fPIE to be able to reproduce the issue (it is not reproducible with -fno-PIE). -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

[Bug ld/25501] New: STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25501 Bug ID: 25501 Summary: STT_GNU_IFUNC causes assertion on 64-bit RISC-V Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Add support|[Z80][PATCH] Add support

[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12242|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/25500] [powerpc] R_PPC_REL16_LO/R_PPC64_REL16_LO referencing a preemptible symbol should be rejected

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25500 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|