[Bug gold/20807] New: gold assertion failure on aarch64 branch target in SHF_MERGE rodata section: internal error in set_merged_symbol_value, at ../../binutils-2.27/gold/object.h:1718

2016-11-11 Thread roland at gnu dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20807 Bug ID: 20807 Summary: gold assertion failure on aarch64 branch target in SHF_MERGE rodata section: internal error in set_merged_symbol_value, at ../../binutils-

[Bug gold/20805] gcc's ThreadSanitizer broken by gold

2016-11-11 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20805 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- % ld -v GNU gold (Gentoo git 2.27.51.2016) 1.12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug gold/20805] gcc's ThreadSanitizer broken by gold

2016-11-11 Thread dvyukov at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20805 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/20800] BFD Linker failing (unresolvable R_X86_64_PLTOFF64) with -mcmodel=large and --start-group

2016-11-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Keno Fischer from comment #4) > ``` > I'd also be happy to give you SSH access to this machine. I sent you my ssh key. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/20800] BFD Linker failing (unresolvable R_X86_64_PLTOFF64) with -mcmodel=large and --start-group

2016-11-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Keno Fischer from comment #5) > Created attachment 9625 [details] > My test.o Your test.o works for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug ld/20800] BFD Linker failing (unresolvable R_X86_64_PLTOFF64) with -mcmodel=large and --start-group

2016-11-11 Thread keno at juliacomputing dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800 --- Comment #5 from Keno Fischer --- Created attachment 9625 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9625&action=edit My test.o -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug ld/20800] BFD Linker failing (unresolvable R_X86_64_PLTOFF64) with -mcmodel=large and --start-group

2016-11-11 Thread keno at juliacomputing dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800 --- Comment #4 from Keno Fischer --- Attaching my test.o here. Maybe it's a compiler problem. What version of ld are you using? Maybe it's already fixed? I have: ``` ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.27 Copyright (C) 2016 Free So

[Bug gold/20805] New: gcc's ThreadSanitizer broken by gold

2016-11-11 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20805 Bug ID: 20805 Summary: gcc's ThreadSanitizer broken by gold Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

[Bug ld/20675] [metag] internal error cross-compiling static programs

2016-11-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20675 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi wbx, Thanks. Please could you upload the following files as well ? crtbegin.o crtend.o libgcc.a libc.a Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug ld/20800] BFD Linker failing (unresolvable R_X86_64_PLTOFF64) with -mcmodel=large and --start-group

2016-11-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Keno Fischer from comment #2) > This is on stock Ubuntu 16.10. Try adding `-fPIE` to the compile invocation > maybe? I know Debian recently switched that on by default. Works for me: [hjl@gnu-6 pr

[Bug gas/20732] set failed on sparc with NANOSEC

2016-11-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20732 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gas/20732] set failed on sparc with NANOSEC

2016-11-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20732 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=86b80085c889cd388fa677a5ae9053fd4be3776c commit 86b80085c889cd388fa677a5ae9

[Bug binutils/20751] Enhancement: make 'nm' to show symbol versions; improve documentation on symbol versions for 'objdump' and 'readelf'; (?) standardize version display format

2016-11-11 Thread sasha2048 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20751 --- Comment #5 from sasha1024 --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailma

[Bug binutils/20751] Enhancement: make 'nm' to show symbol versions; improve documentation on symbol versions for 'objdump' and 'readelf'; (?) standardize version display format

2016-11-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20751 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Sasha, > The output format is similar to that produced by the @option{--syms} > option, except that an extra field is inserted before the symbol's > -name, giving the version information associated wi

[Bug gas/20803] Sparc R_SPARC_32 reloc with miss-align offset.

2016-11-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20803 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/20751] Enhancement: make 'nm' to show symbol versions; improve documentation on symbol versions for 'objdump' and 'readelf'; (?) standardize version display format

2016-11-11 Thread sasha2048 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20751 --- Comment #3 from sasha1024 --- Amazing! Thanks. I didn't expect it to be resolved so fast. The only thing I'd add is: --- a/binutils/doc/binutils.texi2016-11-11 14:24:37.868568232 +0200 +++ b/binutils/doc/binutils.texi2016-

[Bug binutils/20751] Enhancement: make 'nm' to show symbol versions; improve documentation on symbol versions for 'objdump' and 'readelf'; (?) standardize version display format

2016-11-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20751 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20751] Enhancement: make 'nm' to show symbol versions; improve documentation on symbol versions for 'objdump' and 'readelf'; (?) standardize version display format

2016-11-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20751 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=df2c87b5803750d21f03b7d36f8d1abace3e1e14 commit df2c87b5803750d21f03b7d36f8

[Bug binutils/20722] Unrecognized storage class error when building dlls with --gc-sections

2016-11-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20722 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20722] Unrecognized storage class error when building dlls with --gc-sections

2016-11-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20722 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7103ad7639b7ed80bec170404185a8e39079446b commit 7103ad7639b7ed80bec17040418