http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.23 (HEAD)
--
Configure bugmail: http://so
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-10 00:38:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 6333
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6333
A patch
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
Configure bug
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-09 23:26:02
UTC ---
x86-64 backend uses the reloc_count field in .rela.plt section
to store the number of relocations it has. It confuses
bfd_elf_final_link to set SEC_RELOC on .rela.plt, which
leads to err
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12913
--- Comment #10 from Robert Millan 2012-04-09 17:10:06 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> It may have been an unfortunate choice to use EI_OSABI for the meaning that
> ELFOSABI_GNU has.
You could have asked...
> But it's already been done an
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12913
Roland McGrath changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13964
Bug #: 13964
Summary: ARM libopcode force-thumb sticks on
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12913
--- Comment #8 from Robert Millan 2012-04-09 08:14:06 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> How would this have worked before? The value 0 (ELFOSABI_NONE) is used
> for nearly all ELF files on GNU systems (GNU/Linux, GNU/Hurd) that don't
> need