[Bug binutils/13947] Strip applied twice corrupts binaries compiled with --emit-relocs

2012-04-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.23 (HEAD) -- Configure bugmail: http://so

[Bug binutils/13947] Strip applied twice corrupts binaries compiled with --emit-relocs

2012-04-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-10 00:38:37 UTC --- Created attachment 6333 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6333 A patch -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug binutils/13947] Strip applied twice corrupts binaries compiled with --emit-relocs

2012-04-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- Configure bug

[Bug binutils/13947] Strip applied twice corrupts binaries compiled with --emit-relocs

2012-04-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13947 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-09 23:26:02 UTC --- x86-64 backend uses the reloc_count field in .rela.plt section to store the number of relocations it has. It confuses bfd_elf_final_link to set SEC_RELOC on .rela.plt, which leads to err

[Bug binutils/12913] Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD

2012-04-09 Thread rmh at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 --- Comment #10 from Robert Millan 2012-04-09 17:10:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > It may have been an unfortunate choice to use EI_OSABI for the meaning that > ELFOSABI_GNU has. You could have asked... > But it's already been done an

[Bug binutils/12913] Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD

2012-04-09 Thread roland at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 Roland McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug binutils/13964] New: ARM libopcode force-thumb sticks on

2012-04-09 Thread dave at treblig dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13964 Bug #: 13964 Summary: ARM libopcode force-thumb sticks on Product: binutils Version: 2.22 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/12913] Should rename ELFOSABI_LINUX into ELFOSABI_GNU, and drop ELFOSABI_HURD

2012-04-09 Thread rmh at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 --- Comment #8 from Robert Millan 2012-04-09 08:14:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > How would this have worked before? The value 0 (ELFOSABI_NONE) is used > for nearly all ELF files on GNU systems (GNU/Linux, GNU/Hurd) that don't > need