[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-08 01:12 --- (In reply to comment #8) > That is your bug. You never want to do > > -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a > > You should use > > -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive Ooops. That means that the offe

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-08 01:04 --- That is your bug. You never want to do -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a You should use -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are r

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-08 01:17 --- (In reply to comment #8) The fixed libJTC fixed the problem, no crash anymore. I have forwarded your patch to the maintainer as well. Thanks again for help. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-08 00:43 --- (In reply to comment #6) > There is a bug in libJTC.so which references an internal symbol, > __fini_array_end. When linker tried to report the user error, > it crashed. This patch > > http://sourceware.org/m

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
fix the linker. Now I get /usr/gcc-4.0/bin/g++ -B./ -o vhdMetaEngine vhdWinApp.o -Wl,-rpath- link,usr/lib -Llib -lDynLib -lvhdMath -lvhdKernel -lvhdQManager -lDynLib - lvhdOmniORB -lxerces-c -lJTC -ldl -lomniORB4 ./ld: BFD 2.16.90.0.3 20050507 assertion fail /net/gnu/export/linux/src/binutils

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-07 23:44 --- Here you are: http://vrlab.epfl.ch/~janoc/files/libs.tar.gz -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the b

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 23:22 --- I need your libpython2.4.so.1.0 and libomnithread.so.3. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are wat

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-07 22:34 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The compilation flags for the shared libs were: > -g -frtti -fexceptions -pipe -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused- > variable -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wno-endif-labels -Wno-sign-co

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-07 22:32 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please make the binary available to me. I will take a look. You can find the set of binaries used in the failed command here: http://vrlab.epfl.ch/~janoc/files/binutils-bug.tar.gz

[Bug gas/940] IA64 assembler fails to put unwind section into section group

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940 --- You are receiving this m

[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 20:30 --- Please make the binary available to me. I will take a look. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug gas/940] IA64 assembler fails to put unwind section into section group

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 20:23 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00327.html -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list f

[Bug gas/940] New: IA64 assembler fails to put unwind section into section group

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
This comment: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21070#c7 shows an ia64 assembler bug: /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-suse-linux/4.0.1/../../../../ia64-suse-linux/bin/ld: `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN12ConstantPool9CPInvalidD1Ev' referenced in section `.gnu.linkonce.ia64unw._ZN12ConstantPool9CPInvalidD1Ev'

[Bug ld/939] New: Assertion failed in linker

2005-05-07 Thread jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch
Hello, I am running binutils binutils-2.16.90.0.2-2mdk (Mandrake Cooker, i586). After upgrade from 2.15.x series which Mandrake used before, I am getting this error on linking: g++ --export-dynamic -o /home/janoc/src/VHD/VHDPP_TEST/bin/vhdMetaEngine vhdMetaEngine/vhdWinApp.o -L/home/janoc/src/VHD

[Bug gas/936] sh64-elf is broken

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 18:25 --- Joern, does the patch work for you? -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/806] Addr2line ignores the DWARF DW_AT_ranges attributes

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 18:22 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolut

[Bug ld/885] Missing adjustment to the ld-mmix testsuite

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 14:49 --- The testcases expect local symbols in executable's symbol table. But they aren't. I don't know much about mmix to say if it is correct or wrong. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=885 --- Yo

[Bug binutils/843] objdump prints wrong register size for "jmpq/callq *%XXX"

2005-05-07 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 13:38 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolut

[Bug ld/932] hidden symbol `__gcov_execvp' in /usr/lib64/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.0.1/libgcov.a(_gcov_execvp.o) is referenced by DSO

2005-05-07 Thread olh at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-07 13:26 --- the reason is a missing -fprofile-arcs when linking libtcl8.4.so openssl fails because -fprofile-arcs is missing when linking libcrypto.so closing this bug as invalid. -- What|Removed

[Bug ld/932] hidden symbol `__gcov_execvp' in /usr/lib64/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.0.1/libgcov.a(_gcov_execvp.o) is referenced by DSO

2005-05-07 Thread olh at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-07 12:21 --- this seems to be the cause: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=932 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list fo

[Bug ld/932] hidden symbol `__gcov_execvp' in /usr/lib64/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.0.1/libgcov.a(_gcov_execvp.o) is referenced by DSO

2005-05-07 Thread olh at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-07 11:52 --- I see the same on i386, for openssl and tcl. They use -fprofile-arcs in CFLAGS. Last successful build was with gcc-20050424. I have no testresults between 20050424 and 20050504, yet -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugz

[Bug ld/885] Missing adjustment to the ld-mmix testsuite

2005-05-07 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-05-07 06:24 --- In response to comment #1: This PR is here to track the state of the failures, so until it's RESOLVED/FIXED "it's not fixed". But that's the obvious answer. Do you see "spurious" passes for these tests? Since y

[Bug gas/886] gas/mmix/relax2 fails

2005-05-07 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-05-07 06:27 --- Same general reply as in PR 885, but for this one, I'm assigned to fix it. Do you see spurious passes on some host? -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=886 --- You are receiving this mai