On 08/24/2010 03:01 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Or, just skip that part of the test, similar to autotest.at:Syntax
error. Sorry, I failed to see earlier that we have dealt with this
kind of issue before elsewhere.
Yes,
skipping sound good to me in this case.
Tested FreeBSD and AIX sh as well
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:02:55PM CEST:
> On 14.08.2010 09:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:55:13AM CEST:
> >> The least radical step would be to just modify the test group to accept
> >> any kind of exit status and if wrongly
Hello,
On 14.08.2010 09:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:55:13AM CEST:
>> The least radical step would be to just modify the test group to accept
>> any kind of exit status and if wrongly zero, look for at least an error
>> message from the shell. E
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:55:13AM CEST:
> The least radical step would be to just modify the test group to accept
> any kind of exit status and if wrongly zero, look for at least an error
> message from the shell. Eric, WDYT?
Or, just skip that part of the test, similar t
