Hello,

On 14.08.2010 09:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 09:55:13AM CEST:
>> The least radical step would be to just modify the test group to accept
>> any kind of exit status and if wrongly zero, look for at least an error
>> message from the shell.  Eric, WDYT?
> Or, just skip that part of the test, similar to autotest.at:Syntax
> error.  Sorry, I failed to see earlier that we have dealt with this
> kind of issue before elsewhere.
>
Yes,
skipping sound good to me in this case.
> Thanks,
> Ralf
>
>
Bye
  Rainer

Reply via email to