Hi,
There are two inconsistencies (and slightly annoying) when editing:
1 - is a small inconsistency when deleting lines in editor mode.
∇X[⎕]
[0] X
[1] a
[2] b
[3] c
[4] d
[5] e
[6] f
∇
[7] [∆1-3] the editor only deletes lines 1 and 2
[6] [⎕]
∇
[0] X
[3] c
[4]
I would suggest looking at IBM APL2 and just do what they do.
--blake
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:42 AM Hans-Peter Sorge <
hanspeterso...@netscape.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are two inconsistencies (and slightly annoying) when editing:
>
> 1 - is a small inconsistency when deleting lines in edit
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Re: Function editing and line editing have inconsistencies.
Datum: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:04:38 +0100
Von:Hans-Peter Sorge
An: Blake McBride
I'd like it that way.
In IBM APL2 you can do full screen editing. But in Gnu-APL o
First, in addition to any full screen editor IBM APL2 has, it has the
regular line editing standard with APL too.
Second, I am not suggesting the GNU APL add a screen editing capability.
Third, I went into IBM APL2 and confirmed both errors reported by
Hans-Peter. GNU APL is in error here.
Than
If you use Emacs, you would be happy to know that Elias Mårtenson has
implemented fantastic mode for GNU APL:
https://github.com/lokedhs/gnu-apl-mode
It makes working with GNU APL a pleasure and removes the necessity of the
full screen editing.
Br,
/Alexey
Hans-Peter Sorge writes:
>
Or ... I wrote a portable APL-only editor available at
https://github.com/blakemcbride/APLEditor
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:00 PM Alexey Veretennikov <
alexey.veretenni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you use Emacs, you would be happy to know that Elias Mårtenson has
> implemented fantastic mode for G
Hello, receiving the following segfault when attempting to use dfn's with
all possible arguments: ⍵ ⍺ ⍹ ⍶ χ.
{⍵+1}{⍹ ⍶ χ+⍵}[1]{⍵+1} 1
===
SEGMENTATION FAULT
-- Stack trace at main.cc:88
-
