First, in addition to any full screen editor IBM APL2 has, it has the
regular line editing standard with APL too.

Second, I am not suggesting the GNU APL add a screen editing capability.

Third, I went into IBM APL2 and confirmed both errors reported by
Hans-Peter.  GNU APL is in error here.

Thanks.

Blake McBride


On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:05 PM Hans-Peter Sorge <
hanspeterso...@netscape.net> wrote:

>
>
>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: Function editing and line editing have inconsistencies.
> Datum: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:04:38 +0100
> Von: Hans-Peter Sorge <hanspeterso...@netscape.net>
> <hanspeterso...@netscape.net>
> An: Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> <blake1...@gmail.com>
>
> I'd like it that way.
>
> In IBM APL2 you can do full screen editing. But in Gnu-APL only line
> editing can be done.
>
> I think it would be a rather big change to the terminal functionality to
> make it work like IBM APL2.
>
> I did use emacs / M-x shell. This can handle screen editing of any line
> (input and output).
> However the original line being edited gets echoed too and
>   as more than one line can be edited only the most recent line which was
> edited gets echoed,
>   and any other line that was edited too, remains as is.
> In IBM-APL2, any line changed will become an input line.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hans-Peter
>
>
> Am 12.03.20 um 15:57 schrieb Blake McBride:
>
> I would suggest looking at IBM APL2 and just do what they do.
>
> --blake
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:42 AM Hans-Peter Sorge <
> hanspeterso...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are two inconsistencies (and slightly annoying) when editing:
>>
>> 1 - is a small inconsistency when deleting lines in editor mode.
>>
>>      ∇X[⎕]
>> [0]   X
>> [1]   a
>> [2]   b
>> [3]   c
>> [4]   d
>> [5]   e
>> [6]   f
>>      ∇
>> [7] [∆1-3]   the editor only deletes lines 1 and 2
>> [6] [⎕]
>>      ∇
>> [0]   X
>> [3]   c
>> [4]   d
>> [5]   e
>> [6]   f
>>      ∇
>> [7] [∆4-7]   but the editor complains, if I want to delete the last line
>> ∇-command failed: Bad line number N in [M∆N]
>> [7] [∆4-6]  again last line is being excluded from delete
>> [6] [⎕]
>>      ∇
>> [0]   X
>> [3]   c
>> [6]   f
>>      ∇
>> [7] [∆6]    need to delete last line in an additional step.
>> [7] [⎕]
>>      ∇
>> [0]   X
>> [3]   c
>>      ∇
>>
>> Expected: delete lines x to y including line y in [∆x-y]
>>
>>
>> 2 - moving cursor to previous line(s) skips most recent entry
>>
>> enter:
>>        123
>> 123
>>        456
>> 456
>>
>> cursor up - display entry line 456
>> cursor up - display entry line 123
>> cursor down - display entry line 123
>> cursor down - display current entry line
>> cursor up - display line 123  - should be line 456
>>
>> In general:
>> after ENTER, the cursor moves one line up
>> after a CURSOR move up/down, the cursor moves two lines up.
>> This is also true during function editing.
>>
>> Expected: cursor move should be line by line.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Hans-Peter
>>
>
>

Reply via email to