Hi Jürgen:
Never noticed the link before but I just printed it out for thoughtful reading.
respect….
Peter
On 2014-05-08, at 10:25 AM, Juergen Sauermann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a proposal earlier but haven't received any comments so far.
>
> The document is available here:
> http://w
I missed the link the first time around, I think.
I'll take a look at this tonight or tomorrow.
Thank you.
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 16:25 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a proposal earlier but haven't received any comments so
> far.
>
> The document is available here:
> h
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 14:56 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> 'lib_file_io' ⎕fx 'pkg⍙fileio'
Thank you.
Hi,
I have written a proposal earlier but haven't received any comments so far.
The document is available here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/apl/Library-Guidelines.html
so that we don't need to scan the bug-apl mail archive.
According to it package⍙ is the prefix for meta information of a pack
Is this the standard system we should abide by? To separate the module and
function name with ⍙? Are we using ∆ for public functions and ⍙ for private
ones? So far I've used ∆∆ (two deltas) as separator for internal functions.
Regards,
Elias
On 8 May 2014 20:56, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi Da
Hi David,
thanks, fixed in SVN 252.
/// Jürgen
On 05/07/2014 08:53 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
'lib_file_io' ⎕fx 'pkg⍙fileio'
pkg⍙fileio
)erase pkg⍙fileio
'lib_file_io' ⎕fx 'pkg⍙fileio'
pkg⍙fileio
pkg⍙fileio⍬
VALUE ERROR
pkg⍙fileio⍬
^
'lib_file_io' ⎕fx 'pkg⍙fileio'
pkg⍙fileio
)erase pkg⍙fileio
'lib_file_io' ⎕fx 'pkg⍙fileio'
pkg⍙fileio
pkg⍙fileio⍬
VALUE ERROR
pkg⍙fileio⍬
^
