Yes, I use GIT & SVN all over the place. I also do daily backups. The
problem I had would have been between any of those backups.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> I'm always using source control, even for my personal local projects. That
> allows me to revert back to
I'm always using source control, even for my personal local projects. That
allows me to revert back to previous versions without any problems.
I also use it for my local Emacs configuration. Very useful for keeping my
machines in sync.
Regards,
Elias
On 29 May 2014 21:35, Blake McBride wrote:
At times, yes. The particular case I am in, I am actually editing the .apl
file directly because I have a lot of global search/replace operations. I
am migrating some code from one WS to another. )COPY messed me up bad
yesterday. I ended up throwing away my work and going to a backup. I am
rea
Wouldn't it make more sense to edit your code in files, and load it when
needed? I.e. to keep the canonical version in the file instead of the
workspace.
The fact that you are protected from interpreter crashes should be reason
enough I think.
Regards,
Elias
On 29 May 2014 21:12, "Blake McBride"
Sorry about that. I oversimplified an actual case I had. I'll re-raise
the issue if and when I hit it again. (I don't remember where that was.)
On another note, the two )COPY issues have become a bit of a stumbling
block for me. I actually lost work yesterday because of them. (I am
finishing
Hi Blake,
according to IBM [] binds stronger than vector notation (APL2 language
reference, page 34).
IBM APL2 also gives RANK ERROR in the examples below. Eg. 1 2 3[2] is
evaluateded as 1 2 ( 3[2] ).
/// Jürgen
On 05/28/2014 06:41 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
)CLEAR
CLEAR WS
1 2 3
)CLEAR
CLEAR WS
1 2 3[2]
RANK ERROR
1 2 3[2]
^^
1 2 3[2 2]
RANK ERROR
1 2 3[2 2]
^^
x←1 2 3
x[2 2]
2 2
Of course, they should all work as if they were assigned to a variable
first.
Blake