Yes, I use GIT & SVN all over the place. I also do daily backups. The problem I had would have been between any of those backups.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm always using source control, even for my personal local projects. That > allows me to revert back to previous versions without any problems. > > I also use it for my local Emacs configuration. Very useful for keeping my > machines in sync. > > Regards, > Elias > > > On 29 May 2014 21:35, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> At times, yes. The particular case I am in, I am actually editing the >> .apl file directly because I have a lot of global search/replace >> operations. I am migrating some code from one WS to another. )COPY messed >> me up bad yesterday. I ended up throwing away my work and going to a >> backup. I am really looking forward to the two )COPY problems being >> resolved. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Blake >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Wouldn't it make more sense to edit your code in files, and load it when >>> needed? I.e. to keep the canonical version in the file instead of the >>> workspace. >>> >>> The fact that you are protected from interpreter crashes should be >>> reason enough I think. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Elias >>> On 29 May 2014 21:12, "Blake McBride" <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry about that. I oversimplified an actual case I had. I'll >>>> re-raise the issue if and when I hit it again. (I don't remember where >>>> that was.) >>>> >>>> On another note, the two )COPY issues have become a bit of a stumbling >>>> block for me. I actually lost work yesterday because of them. (I am >>>> finishing up an APL editor written in APL. I would typically load the WS I >>>> want to edit, copy the editor WS, edit the WS, and then ⎕EX the editor. >>>> This doesn't work without a functioning )COPY. Thanks!) >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Blake >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Juergen Sauermann < >>>> juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Blake, >>>>> >>>>> according to IBM [] binds stronger than vector notation (APL2 language >>>>> reference, page 34). >>>>> IBM APL2 also gives RANK ERROR in the examples below. Eg. 1 2 3[2] is >>>>> evaluateded as 1 2 ( 3[2] ). >>>>> >>>>> /// Jürgen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 05/28/2014 06:41 PM, Blake McBride wrote: >>>>> >>>>> )CLEAR >>>>> CLEAR WS >>>>> 1 2 3[2] >>>>> RANK ERROR >>>>> 1 2 3[2] >>>>> ^^ >>>>> 1 2 3[2 2] >>>>> RANK ERROR >>>>> 1 2 3[2 2] >>>>> ^^ >>>>> x←1 2 3 >>>>> x[2 2] >>>>> 2 2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Of course, they should all work as if they were assigned to a >>>>> variable first. >>>>> >>>>> Blake >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >
