with nothing assigned to b
a←b
VALUE ERROR
a←b
^
makes consistant sense that the x←gg would be a value error
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:51:44 -0500
Blake McBride wrote:
> That certainly ends any debate. Thanks!
>
> Blake
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Ju
That certainly ends any debate. Thanks!
Blake
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi Blake,
>
> my initial thinking was also that this is a syntax error.
> However the ISO standard wants a value error (around page 67):"
>
> "Pattern V
Hi Blake,
my initial thinking was also that this is a syntax error.
However the ISO standard wants a value error (around page 67):"
"Pattern V ← B
Evaluation Sequence:
If B is not a value, signal value-error."
/// Jürgen
On 04/15/2014 07:31 AM, Blake McBride wrote:
Additionally, while thei
Additionally, while their may be a semantic problem with that code as you
point out, there is utterly nothing wrong with the _syntax_.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think it is really is a syntax error
>
> Creating gg as a 'procedure' (returns no value) vs using it as a fun
Hi
I think it is really is a syntax error
Creating gg as a 'procedure' (returns no value) vs using it as a function
(returns a value) in coding
But argument can be made that gg has no value
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:54:32 +0200
Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hello Blake,
>
> yes, thanks. Fixed in
Hello Blake,
yes, thanks. Fixed in SVN 202.
/// Jürgen
On 04/12/2014 08:00 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
∇gg
[1] 4
[2] ∇
gg
4
x←gg
4
SYNTAX ERROR
x←gg
^ ^
I understand what is wrong with gg. The problem is the error message.
I think it is wrong. Shouldn't it be V
∇gg
[1] 4
[2] ∇
gg
4
x←gg
4
SYNTAX ERROR
x←gg
^ ^
I understand what is wrong with gg. The problem is the error message. I
think it is wrong. Shouldn't it be VALUE ERROR ?
Thanks.
Blake
