Hi Blake,
my initial thinking was also that this is a syntax error.
However the ISO standard wants a value error (around page 67):"
"Pattern V ← B
Evaluation Sequence:
If B is not a value, signal value-error."
/// Jürgen
On 04/15/2014 07:31 AM, Blake McBride wrote:
Additionally, while their may be a semantic problem with that code as
you point out, there is utterly nothing wrong with the _syntax_.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, <enz...@gmx.com
<mailto:enz...@gmx.com>> wrote:
Hi
I think it is really is a syntax error
Creating gg as a 'procedure' (returns no value) vs using it as a
function (returns a value) in coding
But argument can be made that gg has no value
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:54:32 +0200
Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de
<mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>> wrote:
> Hello Blake,
>
> yes, thanks. Fixed in SVN 202.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
> On 04/12/2014 08:00 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
> > ∇gg gg created as a 'procedure'
> > [1] 4
> > [2] ∇
> > gg
> > 4
> > x←gg use of gg as a 'function'
> > 4
> > SYNTAX ERROR
> > x←gg
> > ^ ^
> >
> > I understand what is wrong with gg. The problem is the error
message.
> > I think it is wrong. Shouldn't it be VALUE ERROR ?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Blake
> >
>
>
